Skip to main content

The tangibility reflection principle for self-verifying axiom systems

  • Contributed Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Logic and Proof Theory (KGC 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1289))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

At the 1993 meeting of the Kurt Gödel Society, we described some axiom systems that could verify their own consistency and prove all Peano Arithmetic's II1 theorems. We will extend these results by introducing some new axiom systems which use stronger definitions of self-consistency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Benett, Ph. D. Dissertation, Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Bezboruah and J. Shepherdson, “Gödel's Second Incompleteness Theorem for Q”, J of Symbolic Logic 41 (1976), 503–512.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Buss, “Polynomial Hierarchy and Fragments of Bounded Arithmetic“, 17th ACM Symposium on Theory of Comp (1985) pp. 285-290

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Buss, Bounded Arithmetic, Princeton Ph. D. dissertation published in Proof Theory Lecture Notes, Vol. 3, published by Bibliopolic (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Feferman, “Arithmetization of Metamathematics in a General Setting”, Fund Math 49 (1960) pp. 35–92.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Hájek, “On the Interpretatability of Theories Containing Arithmetic (11)”, Comm. Math. Univ. Carol. 22 (1981) pp.595–594.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Hájek and P. Pudlák, Metamathematics of First Order Arith, SpringerVerlag 1991

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Jeroslow, “Consistency Statements in Formal Mathematics”, Fundamentae Mathematicae 72 (1971) pp. 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Kleene, “On the Notation of Ordinal Numbers”, JSL 3 (1938), pp. 150–156.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Krajíček, “A Note on the Proofs of Falsehoods”, Arch Math Logik 26 (1987) pp. 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Krajícek, Bounded Propositional Logic and Compl. Theory, Cambridge U Press 1995

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Krajicek and P. Pudlik, “Propositional Proof Systems, The Consistency of First-Order Theories and The Complexity of Computation”, JSL 54 (1989) pp 1063–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Kreisel, “A Survey of Proof Theory, Part I” in Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1968) pp. 321–388 and “ Part II” in Proceedings of Second Scandinavian Logic Symposium (1971) North Holland Press (with Fenstad ed.), Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Kreisel and G. Takeuti, “Formally self-referential propositions for cut-free classical analysis and related systems”, Dissertations Mathematica 118, 1974 pp. 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Löb, A Solution to a Problem by Leon Henkin, JSL 20 (1955) pp. 115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Nelson, Predicative Arithmetic, Mathematical Notes, Princeton Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.Parikh, “Existence and Feasibility in Arithmetic”, JSL 36 (1971), pp.494–508.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Paris and C. Dimitracopoulos, “A Note on the Undefinability of Cuts”, JSL 48 (1983) pp. 564–569.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Paris and A. Wilkie, “Δ0 Sets and Induction”, Proceedings of the Jadswin Logic Conference (Poland), Leeds University Press (1981) pp. 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Pudlák, “Cuts Consistency Statements and Interpretations”, JSL 50 (1985) 423–442.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Pudlák, “On the Lengths of Proofs of Consistency”, Kurt Gödel Soceity Proc. (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. Rogers, Theory of Rec. Funct. & Effective Comp., McGraw Hill 1967, see pp 186–188.

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. Smorynski, “The Incompleteness Theorem”, Handbook Math Logic, 821–866, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Solovay, Private Communications (April 1994) proving Footnote l's statement. (See Appendix A of [31] for more details about Solovay's Extension of Pudlik's theorem [20].)

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Statman, “Herbrand's theorem and Gentzen's Notion of a Direct Proof”, Handbook on Math Logic, (1983) pp. 897–913.

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. Takeuti, “On a Generalized Logical Calculus“, Japan J. Math 23 (1953) 39–96.

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. Takeuti, Proof Theory, Studies in Logic Volume 81, North Holland, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Wilkie and J. Paris, “On the Scheme of Induction for Bounded Arithmetic”, Annals Pure Applied Logic (35) 1987, pp. 261–302.

    Google Scholar 

  29. D. Willard, “Self-Verifying Axiom Systems”, in Proceedings of the Third Kurt Gödel Symposium (1993) pp. 325–336, published in Springer-Verlag LNCS (Vol. 713).

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. Willard, “Self-Reflection Principles and NP-Hardness”, in Proceedings of 1996 DIMACS Workshop on Feasible Arithmetic and Length of Proof (AMS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. D. Willard, “Self-Verifying Axiom Systems, the Incompleteness Theorem and Related Reflection Principles” manuscript (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  32. D. Willard, “Some Curious Exceptions to the Second Incompleteness Theorem”, longer manuscript which is the unabridged version of the present conference paper.

    Google Scholar 

  33. C. Wrathall, Rudimentary Predicates and Relative Computation, Siam J. on Computing 7 (1978), pp. 194–209.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Georg Gottlob Alexander Leitsch Daniele Mundici

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Willard, D.E. (1997). The tangibility reflection principle for self-verifying axiom systems. In: Gottlob, G., Leitsch, A., Mundici, D. (eds) Computational Logic and Proof Theory. KGC 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1289. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63385-5_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63385-5_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63385-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69806-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics