Skip to main content

Three semantics of the output operation for generative communication

  • Regular Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Coordination Languages and Models (COORDINATION 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1282))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A simple, yet Turing powerful, calculus based on generative communication is introduced; among its primitives, it contains a conditional input operation that tests for presence (or absence) of an output, reminiscent of the inp predicate of Linda. We study three different operational semantics for the output operation, called instantaneous, ordered and unordered. The associated behavioural semantics are obtained as the coarsest congruence contained in the corresponding strong barbed semantics. We prove that when the output operation is instantaneous, the obtained semantics is a sort of asynchronous bisimulation; on the contrary, for the ordered semantics, as well as for the unordered one, the resulting semantics is a small variant of the classic (synchronous) bisimulation. A further result is that the language under unordered semantics is no more Turing powerful, hence the language becomes strictly less expressive.

Work supported by Esprit Working Group Coordina.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Amadio, I. Castellani, and D. Sangiorgi. On Bisimulations for the Asynchronous π-Calculus. In Proc. CONCUR'96, volume 1119 of LNCS, pages 147–162, Springer Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Boudol. Asynchrony and the π-calculus. Technical Report 1702, INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Busi and R. Gorrieri. A Petri Net Semantics for π-calculus. In Proc. CONCUR'95, volume 962 of LNCS, pages 145–159, Springer Verlag, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Busi, R. Gorrieri, and G. Zavattaro. A Truly Concurrent view of Linda Interprocess Communication. Technical Report UBLCS-97-02, Department of Computer Science, University of Bologna, February 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Busi, R. Gorrieri, and G. Zavattaro. On the Turing Equivalence of Linda Coordination Primitives. Technical Report UBLCS-97-05, Department of Computer Science, University of Bologna, May 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Busi, R. Gorrieri, and G. Zavattaro, A Process Algebraic View of Linda Coordination Primitives. To appear in Theoretical Computer Science. Available as Technical Report UBLCS-97-06, Department of Computer Science, University of Bologna, May 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. Busi and G.M. Pinna. A Causal Semantics for Contextual P/T nets. In Proc. ICTCS'95, 311–325, World Scientific, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Ciancarini, R. Gorrieri, and G. Zavattaro. Towards a Calculus for Generative Communication. In Proc. 1st IFIP Conf. on FMOODS'96, pages 283–297. Chapman & Hall, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Gelernter. Generative Communication in Linda. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 7(1):80–112, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Gelernter and N. Carriero. Coordination Languages and their Significance. Communications of the ACM, 35(2):97–107, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J.F. Groote. Transition system specifications with negative premises. Theoretical Computer Science, 118:263–299, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Hansen, J. Kleist, and H. Hüttel. Bisimulations for Asynchronous Mobile Processes. In Proc. Tbilisi Symposium on Language, Logic, and Computation, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Honda and M. Tokoro. An Object Calculus for Asynchronous Communication. In Proc. ECOOP '91, volume 512 of LNCS, pages 133–147. Springer Verlag, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Milner. Communication and Concurrency. Prentice-Hall, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Milner and D. Sangiorgi. Barbed Bisimulation. In Proc. ICALP'92, volume 623 of LNCS, pages 685–695, Springer Verlag, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. L. Minsky. Computation: finite and infinite machines. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  17. U. Montanari and F. Rossi. Contextual Nets. Acta Informatica, 32(6):545–596, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. E. Narem. An Informal Operational Semantics of C-Linda V2.3.5. Technical Report YALEU/DCS/TR-839, Department of Computer Science, Yale University, December 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Scientific Computing Associates. Linda: User's guide and reference manual. Scientific Computing Associates, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. C. Shepherdson and J. E. Sturgis. Computability of recursive functions. Journal of the ACM, 10:217–255, 1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David Garlan Daniel Le Métayer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Busi, N., Gorrieri, R., Zavattaro, G. (1997). Three semantics of the output operation for generative communication. In: Garlan, D., Le Métayer, D. (eds) Coordination Languages and Models. COORDINATION 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1282. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63383-9_82

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63383-9_82

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63383-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69527-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics