Skip to main content

Checking properties of polynomials

Extended abstract

  • Session 3: Computational Complexity
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1256))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 125 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we show how to construct efficient checkers for programs that supposedly compute properties of polynomials. The properties we consider are roots, norms, and other analytic/algebraic functions of polynomials. In our model, both the program II and the polynomial p are available to the checker each as a black box. We show how to check programs that compute a specific root (e.g., the largest) or a subset of roots of the given polynomial.

The checkers, in addition to never computing the root(s) themselves, strive to minimize both the running time (preferably o(deg2 p)) and the number of black box evaluations of p (preferably o(degp)). We obtain deterministic checkers when a separation bound between the roots is known and probabilistic checkers when the roots can be arbitrarily close. We then extend the checkers to handle the situations when the program II returns an approximation to the root and when the evaluation of the polynomial p is approximate. Our results translate into efficient checkers for matrix spectra computations both in the exact and approximate settings, operating in the library model of [BLR93]. Next we show that the usual characterization of norms using the triangle inequality is not suited for self-testing in the exact case, but surprisingly, could be used in the approximate case.

Our results are complementary to most of the existing results on testing polynomials. The testers in the latter have the goal of determining whether a program computes a polynomial of given degree, whereas we are interested in checking the properties of a given polynomial.

This work was done while the first, second, and fourth authors were visiting Sandia National Labs. The second and fourth authors are also supported by the NSF Career Award CCR-9624552, the Alfred P. Sloan Research Award, and the NSF grant DMI-91157199.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Ar, M. Blum, B. Codenotti, and P. Gemmell. Checking approximate computations over the reals. Proc. 25th STOC, pp. 786–795, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Arora, C. Lund, R. Motwani, M. Sudan, and M. Szegedy. Proof verification and hardness of approximation problems. Proc. 33rd FOCS, pp. 14–23, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Arora and S. Safra. Probabilistic checking of proofs: A new characterization of NP. Proc. 33rd FOCS, pp. 2–13, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Blum. Designing programs to check their work. TR 88-009, ICSI, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Blum and S. Kannan. Program correctness checking ... and the design of programs that check their work. Proc. 21st STOC, pp. 86–97, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Blum, M. Luby, and R. Rubinfeld. Self-testing/correcting with applications to numerical problems. JCSS, 47(3):549–595, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Buchberger, G.E. Collins, and R. Loos. Computer Algebra — Symbolic and Algebraic Computation. Springer-Verlag, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.B. Conway. Functions of One Complex Variable. Springer-Verlag, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Ergün. Testing multivariate linear functions: Overcoming the generator bottleneck. Proc. 27th STOC, pp. 407–416, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Freivalds. Fast probabilistic algorithms. Proc. 8th MFCS, LNCS 74, pp. 57–69, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Ergün, S. Ravi Kumar, and R. Rubinfeld. Approximate checking of polynomials and functional equations. Proc. 37th FOCS, To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Gemmell, R. Lipton, R. Rubinfeld, M. Sudan, and A. Wigderson. Self-testing/correcting for polynomials and for approximate functions. Proc. 23rd STOC, pp. 32–42, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. O. Goldreich, S. Goldwasser, and D. Ron. Property testing and its connection to learning and approximation. Proc. 37th FOCS, pp. 339–348, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G.H. Golub and C. Van Loan. Matrix Computations. Johns Hopkins U. Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.A. Jenkins and J.F. Traub. Principles for testing polynomial zero-finding programs. ACM Trans. on Mathematical Software, 1:26–34, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Kannan. Program Result Checking with Applications. PhD thesis, U. of California at Berkeley, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Lipton. New directions in testing. Proc. DIMACS Workshop on Distributed Computing and Cryptography, pp. 191–202,1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Marden. Geometry of Polynomials. AMS, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  19. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery. Numerical Recipes in C. Cambridge U. Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Rubinfeld and M. Sudan. Robust characterizations of polynomials and their applications to program testing. SICOMP, 25(2):252–271, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. H. Wilkinson. The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem. Clarendon Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R.E. Zippel. Effective Polynomial Computation. Kluwer Academic Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Pierpaolo Degano Roberto Gorrieri Alberto Marchetti-Spaccamela

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Codenotti, B., Ergün, F., Gemmell, P., Kumar, S.R. (1997). Checking properties of polynomials. In: Degano, P., Gorrieri, R., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1256. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63165-8_178

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63165-8_178

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63165-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69194-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics