Skip to main content

Approximate distributions for Maximum Likelihood and maximum a posteriori estimates under a Gaussian noise model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Information Processing in Medical Imaging (IPMI 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1230))

Abstract

The performance of Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimates in nonlinear problems at low data SNR is not well predicted by the Cramér-Rao or other lower bounds on variance. In order to better characterize the distribution of ML and MAP estimates under these conditions, we derive an approximate density for the conditional distribution of such estimates. In one example, this approximate distribution captures the essential features of the distribution of ML and MAP estimates in the presence of Gaussian-distributed noise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. SP Müller, MF Kijewski, SC Moore, and BL Holman. “Maximum-Likelihood Estimation: A Mathematical Model for Quantitation in Nuclear Medicine,” J Nucl Med 1990; 31:1693–1701.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. HH Barrett. “Objective assessment of image quality: Effects of quantum noise and object variability,” J Opt Soc Am A 1990; 7:1266–1278.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. SP Müller, MF Kijewski, and SC Moore. “The efficiency of ML-estimation at low SNR can be inferred from the probability distribution of the estimates,” J Nucl Med 1995; 36:119P.

    Google Scholar 

  4. SP Müller, MF Kijewski, Christian Kappeler, and SC Moore. “Estimation performance at low SNR: Predictions of the Barankin Bound,” in Medical Imaging 1995: Physics of Medical Imaging, Richard van Meter, Jacob Beutel, Editors. Proc. SPIE 2432:157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  5. JA Fessler and AR Hero. “Cramér-Rao lower bounds for biased image reconstruction,” in Proc. Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 1993, vol. 1, pp. 253–256.

    Google Scholar 

  6. JA Fessler. “Mean and Variance of Implicitly defined Biased Estimators (such as Penalized Maximum Likelihood): Applications to Tomography,” IEEE Trans Image Proc, EDICS 2.3, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. HL Van Trees. Detection, Estimation and Modulation Theory, (Wiley, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  8. HH Barrett and W Swindell. Radiological Imaging: Theory of Image Formation, Detection, and Processing (Academic, New York, 1981), Vol. I.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S Geman and D Geman. “Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions and the Bayesian Restoration of Images,” IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine intelligence, 1984 PAMI-6(6), pp 721–741.

    Google Scholar 

  10. KV Mardia, JT Kent, and JM Bibby. Multivariate analysis, (Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

James Duncan Gene Gindi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abbey, C.K., Clarkson, E., Barrett, H.H., Müller, S.P., Rybicki, F.J. (1997). Approximate distributions for Maximum Likelihood and maximum a posteriori estimates under a Gaussian noise model. In: Duncan, J., Gindi, G. (eds) Information Processing in Medical Imaging. IPMI 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1230. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63046-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63046-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63046-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69070-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics