Skip to main content

Control structures in hypothesis spaces: The influence on learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Learning Theory (EuroCOLT 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1208))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In any learnability setting, hypotheses are conjectured from some hypothesis space. Studied herein are the effects on learnability of the presence or absence of certain control structures in the hypothesis space. First presented are control structure characterizations of some rather specific but illustrative learnability results. Then presented are the main theorems. Each of these characterizes the invariance of a learning class over hypothesis space V (and a little more about V) as: V has suitable instances of all denotational control structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Allen. Anatomy of Lisp. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Angluin. Finding patterns common to a set of strings. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 21:46–62, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Angluin. Inductive inference of formal languages from positive data. Information and Control, 45:117–135, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Blum. A machine independent theory of the complexity of recursive functions. Journal of the ACM, 14:322–336, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Baliga and A. Shende. Learning-theoretic perspectives of acceptable numberings. In Third International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics, January 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Church. The Calculi of Lambda Conversion. Princeton Univ. Press, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Kedzier C. Sammut, S. Hurst and D. Michie. Learning to fly. In D. Sleeman and P. Edwards, editors, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Davis, R. Sigal, and E. Weyuker. Computability, Complexity, and Languages. Academic Press, second edition, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Freivalds, M. Karpinski, and C. H. Smith. Co-learning of total recursive functions. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pages 190–197. ACM-Press, July 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R Freivalds, E. Kinber, and C. H. Smith. On the intrinsic complexity of learning. In Paul Vitanyi, editor, Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computational Lear ning Theory, pages 154–169. Springer-Verlag, March 1995. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 904.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Freivalds, E. Kinber, and R. Wiehagen. Inductive inference and computable one-one numberings. Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 28:463–479, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Freivalds, E. Kinber, and R. Wiehagen. Connections between identifying functionals, standardizing operations, and computable numberings. Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 30:145–164, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. M. Friedberg. Three theorems on recursive enumeration. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 23(3):309–316, September 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Gold. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10:447–474, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Hopcroft and J. Ullman. Introduction to Automata Theory Languages and Computation. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Jain and A. Sharma. On the intrinsic complexity of language identification. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pages 278–286. ACM-Press, July 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Kummer. A note on direct sums of friedbergnumberings. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 54(3): 1009–1010, September 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Marcoux. Composition is almost as good as s-1-1. In Proceedings, Structure in Complexity Theory-Fourth Annual Conference. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Odifreddi. Classical Recursion Theory, volume 125 of Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. Osherson, M. Stob, and S. Weinstein. Systems that Learn, An Introduction to Learning Theory for Cognitive and Computer Scientists. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Quinlan. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. Riccardi. The Independence of Control Structures in Abstract Programming Systems. PhD thesis, SUNY Buffalo, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. Riccardi. The independence of control structures in abstract programming systems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 22:107–143, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Rogers. Gödel numberings of partial recursive functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 23:331–341, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Rogers. Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability. McGraw Hill, New York, 1967. Reprinted, MIT Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Royer. A Connotational Theory of Program Structure. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 273. Springer Verlag, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Stoy. Denotational Semantics: The Scott-Strachey Approach to Programming Language Theory. MIT Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  28. K. Weihrauch. Computability. Springer-Verlag, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. Wiehagen. Characterization problems in the theory of inductive inference. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 62:494–508, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. Wiehagen. Characterizations of learnability in various hypothesis spaces. Private communication, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  31. T. Zeugmann and S. Lange. A guided tour across the boundaries of learning recursive languages. In Klaus P. Jantke and Steffen Lange, editors, Algorithmic Learning for Knowledge-Based Systems, volume 961 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 190–258. Springer-Verlag, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Shai Ben-David

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Case, J., Jain, S., Suraj, M. (1997). Control structures in hypothesis spaces: The influence on learning. In: Ben-David, S. (eds) Computational Learning Theory. EuroCOLT 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1208. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-62685-9_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-62685-9_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-62685-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68431-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics