Skip to main content

Automated time table generation using multiple context reasonig with truth maintenance

  • Resoning About Constrainsts
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling (PATAT 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1153))

Abstract

This paper describes the application of multiple context reasoning and truth maintenance to the automated generation of timetables. The reasoning system used is made up of a rule-based problem-solver which makes inferences and an assumption-based truth maintenance system that maintains a record of the justification of these inferences. While this method has been used for scheduling and planning applications before, the intention in this research is to investigate the practical feasibility of the method on readily accessible hardware. Various implementation prototypes were constructed and tested on a subset of a University Timetabling problem and the results obtained are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Collins, J., and Decoste, D., CATMS: A ATMS which avoids label explosion, Proceedings of AAAI-91, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Kleer, J., An Assumption Based Truth Maintenance System, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 28, No 2, March 1986, pp 127–162.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Doyle, J., A Truth Maintenance System, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 12, No 3, November 1979, pp 231–272.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dressler, O., and Farquhar, A., Putting the Problem Solver back in the driver's seat: Contextual Control of the ATMS, Proceedings of the 2nd AAAI Workshop on Model-Based Reasoning, 1990, pp 106–112.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Filman, R., Reasoning with Worlds and Truth Maintenance, CACM, Vol. 31, No 4, April 1988, pp 382–401.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Forbus, K.D. and De Kleer, J., Building Problem Solvers, MIT Press, Mass, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kimborough, S.O. and Adams, F., Why Nonmonotonic Logic, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 4, 1988, pp 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martins, J., The Truth, the Whole Truth and Nothing But the Truth, AI Magazine, Vol. 11, No 5, January 1991, pp 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Noronha, S.J. and Sarma, V.V.S., Knowledge-Based Approaches for Scheduling Problems: A Survey, IEEE Trans on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 3, No 2, 1991, pp 160–171.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stanojevic, M. et al, Using Truth Maintenance Systems, IEEE Expert, December 1994, pp 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Edmund Burke Peter Ross

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ram, V., Scogings, C. (1996). Automated time table generation using multiple context reasonig with truth maintenance. In: Burke, E., Ross, P. (eds) Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling. PATAT 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1153. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61794-9_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61794-9_54

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61794-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70682-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics