Skip to main content

Putting default logics in perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
KI-96: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (KI 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1137))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The evolution of Reiter's default logic has resulted in diverse variants sharing many interesting properties. This process however seems to be diverging because it has led to default logics that are difficult to compare due to different formal characterizations dealing sometimes even with different objects of discourse. This problem is addressed in this paper. That is, we elaborate on the relationships between different types of default logics. In particular, we show how two recently proposed variants, namely rational and CA-default logic, are related to each other and existing default logics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. Brewka. Cumulative default logic: In defense of nonmonotonic inference rules. Artificial Intelligence, 50(2):183–205, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Delgrande and W. Jackson. Default logic revisited. In J. Allen, R. Fikes, and E. Sandewall, editors, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 118–127, San Mateo, CA, April 1991. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Delgrande, T. Schaub, and W. Jackson. Alternative approaches to default logic. Artificial Intelligence, 70(1–2): 167–237, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Froidevaux and J. Mengin. Default logic: A unified view. Computational Intelligence, 10(3):331–369, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Giordano and A. Martinelli. On cumulative default logics. Artificial Intelligence, 66(1):161–179, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Lévy. Computing extensions of default theories. In R. Kruse and P. Siegel, editors, Proceedings of the European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches for Uncertainty, volume 548 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 219–226. Springer Verlag, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Linke and T. Schaub. Putting default logics in perspective. Technical report, 1996. Submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Lukaszewicz. Considerations on default logic — an alternative approach. Computational Intelligence, 4:1–16, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Makinson. General theory of cumulative inference. In M. Reinfrank, J. de Kleer, M. Ginsberg, and E. Sandewall, editors, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, volume 346 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 1–18. Springer Verlag, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Marek and M. Truszczyński. Normal form results for default logics. In G. Brewka, K. Jantke, and P. Schmitt, editors, Nonmonotonic and Inductive Logic, volume 659 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 153–174. Springer Verlag, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Mikitiuk and M. Truszczyński. Rational default logic and disjunctive logic programming. In A. Nerode and L. Pereira, editors, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on logic Programming and Non-monotonic Reasoning., pages 283–299. MIT Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Mikitiuk and M. Truszczyński. Rational versus constrained default logic. In C. Mellish, editor, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1509–1515. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Poole. What the lottery paradox tells us about default reasoning. In R. Brachman, H. Levesque, and R. Reiter, editors, Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 333–340, Los Altos, CA, May 1989. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Reiter. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13(1–2):81–132, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. Schaub. On commitment and cumulativity in default logics. In R. Kruse and P. Siegel, editors, Proceedings of European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Uncertainty, pages 304–309. Springer Verlag, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Schaub. On constrained default theories. In B. Neumann, editor, Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 304–308. John Wiley & sons, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Schaub. Variations of constrained default logic. In M. Clarke, R. Kruse, and S. Moral, editors, Proceedings of European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, pages 312–317. Springer Verlag, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Günther Görz Steffen Hölldobler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Linke, T., Schaub, T. (1996). Putting default logics in perspective. In: Görz, G., Hölldobler, S. (eds) KI-96: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1137. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61708-6_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61708-6_64

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61708-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70669-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics