Skip to main content

Bringing about rationality: Incorporating plans into a BDI agent architecture

  • Planning
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
PRICAI'96: Topics in Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1114))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Agents attempt to achieve their intentions through the use of plans, leading to further intentions corresponding to the actions and subgoals of those plans. We extend Rao and Georgeff's logic of belief, desire and intention with a logical representation of plans. This representation allows the specification of subgoals, using Segerberg's “bringing it about” modal operator. By using a plan library to semantically restrict an agent's intention-worlds, we define a framework that models the reasoning process of an intention-based autonomous agent. We show that this framework supports several desirable properties involving an agent's commitment to future intentions, based on its available plans.

The authors wish to thank the referees for several useful suggestions. This work was partially supported by the Cooperative Research Centre for Intelligent Decision Systems, Melbourne, Australia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. E. Bratman. Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Cavedon, L. Padgham, A. Rao, and E. A. Sonenberg. Revisiting rationality for agents with intentions. In Eighth Australian Conference on AI, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. R. Cohen and H. J. Levesque. Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence, 42(3), 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. A. Emerson. Temporal and modal logic. In J. van Leeuwen, editor, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science: Volume B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. P. Georgeff and F. F. Ingrand. Decision-making in an embedded reasoning system. In IJCAI-89, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Konolige and M. Pollack. A representationalist theory of intention. In IJCAI-93, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Levesque. All I know: A study in autoepistemic logic. Artificial Intelligence, 42, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. S. Rao and M. P. Georgeff. Asymmetry thesis and side-effect problems in linear time and branching time intention logics. In IJCAI-91, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. S. Rao and M. P. Georgeff. Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In Second Int'l Conf. on Princ. of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Segerberg. Bringing it about. Journal of Phil. Logic, 18, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. P. Singh. Multiagent Systems: A Theoretical Framework for Intentions, Know-How, and Communications. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Wobcke. Plans and the revision of intentions. In First Australian Workshop on Distributed AI, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Norman Foo Randy Goebel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cavedon, L., Rao, A. (1996). Bringing about rationality: Incorporating plans into a BDI agent architecture. In: Foo, N., Goebel, R. (eds) PRICAI'96: Topics in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1114. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61532-6_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61532-6_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61532-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68729-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics