Skip to main content

A tool for handling uncertain information in multi-agent systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Distributed Software Agents and Applications (MAAMAW 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1069))

Abstract

We focus on the strategy problem arising as a manager faces situations involving a choice between a finite set of strategies, having access to a finite set of agents reporting their opinions. The most preferred strategy is determined from the agents' individual opinions and the relative credibility of each agent. The evaluation method used is primarily based on the principle of maximising the expected utility. The evaluation results in a set of admissible strategies. These strategies can be further investigated with respect to their relative strengths and also with respect to the number of values consistent with the given domain that make them admissible.

An earlier version of this paper can be found in the proceedings of the Scandinavian Research Seminar on Information and Decision Networks, April 1994, University College of Växjö, Sweden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bachman, M., and Hurley, S. (eds.): 1991, Essays in the Foundations of Rational Decision, Blackwells.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boman, M.: 1993, A Logical Specification of Federated Information Systems, DSV Report 93-019-DSV, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boman, M., and Ekenberg, L.: 1994, “Eliminating Paraconsistencies in 4-valued Cooperative Deductive Multidatabase Systems with Classical Negation”, Proceedings of Cooperating Knowledge Based Systems 1994, Keele University Press, pp. 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choquet, G.: 1953/54, “Theory of Capacities”, Ann. Inst. Fourier 5, pp. 131–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson, M.: 1995, Computing Best Choices Using Imprecise Information, Report 95-012-DSV, Ph.Lic. thesis, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A.P.: 1967, “Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping”, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Xxxviii, pp.325–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekenberg, L.: 1994a, Decision Support in Numerically Imprecise Domains, Ph.D. thesis, Report 94-003-DSV, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekenberg, L., and Malmnäs P-E.: 1994b, “Generalized Procedures for Handling Security Levels in Decision Situations”, Research Report, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I. J.: 1962, “Subjective Probability as the Measure of a Non-measurable Set”, Logic, Methodology, and the Philosophy of Science, eds. Suppes, Nagel, Tarski, Stanford University Press, pp.319–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz, L.: 1951, “Optimality Criteria for Decision Making under Ignorance”, Cowles Commission Discussion Paper No. 370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E.L.: 1959, Testing Statistical Hypothesis, John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmnäs, P-E.: 1990, Real-Life Decisions, Expected Utility and Effective Computability, Research Report HSFR No. 677/87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmnäs, P-E.: 1994, “Towards a Mechanization of Real Life Decisions”, Logic and Philosophy of Science in Uppsala, eds. Prawitz and Westerståhl, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dortrecht, pp.231–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.: 1951,“The Theory of Statistical Decision”, Journal of the American Statistical Association 46, pp.55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C.A.B.: 1961, “Consistency in Statistical Inference and Decision”, Journal of the Royal Statistic Society, Series B, xxiii, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenney, R., and Sandell jr., N.: 1981, “Strategies for Distributed Decisionmaking”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 11 (8), pp.527–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, A.: 1950, Statistical Decision Functions, John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

John W. Perram Jean-Pierre Müller

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ekenberg, L., Danielson, M., Boman, M. (1996). A tool for handling uncertain information in multi-agent systems. In: Perram, J.W., Müller, JP. (eds) Distributed Software Agents and Applications. MAAMAW 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1069. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61157-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61157-6_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61157-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68335-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics