Skip to main content

Lexical options in multilingual generation from a knowledge base

  • Issues in Realization
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends in Natural Language Generation An Artificial Intelligence Perspective (EWNLG 1993)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1036))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

From the viewpoint of multilingual generation, the common underlying knowledge base should be kept clear of language-specific concepts. This goal presupposes that lexical items of various languages cannot map one-to-one onto concepts all the time. We propose a more flexible way of attaching lexical items to configurations of concepts and roles, and a lexical option finder that determines the set of content words that cover pieces of the message to be expressed, thereby performing the first half of the “chunking” task (dividing the message into separately verbalizable parts). This pool of lexical options will also include synonyms and near-synonyms: items with identical denotation, that is semantic representation in the KB, but different connotational characteristics. From this set, the subsequent steps of the generation process can select the most preferred subset for expressing the message.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Bierwisch, R. Schreuder. “From Concepts to Lexical Items”. In: Cognition 42(1–3), 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.A. Cruse. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. DiMarco, G. Hirst, M. Stede. “The Semantic and Stylistic Differentiation of Synonyms and Near-Synonyms”. In: Working notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Building Lexicons for Machine Translation, Stanford University, March 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Dorr. “Interlingual Machine Translation: A Parameterized Approach”. In: Artificial Intelligence 63, pp. 429–492, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Emele, U. Heid, S. Momma, R. Zajac. “Interactions between Linguistic Constraints: Procedural vs. Declarative Approaches”. In: Machine Translation 7(1–2), 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Garza-Cuarón. Connotation and Meaning. Mouton de-Gruyter, Berlin/New York 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Horacek. “The Architecture of a Generation Component in a Complete Natural Language Dialogue System”. In: R. Dale, C. Mellish, M. Zock (eds.): Current Research in Natural Language Generation. Academic Press, London 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E.H. Hovy. Generating Natural Language under Pragmatic Constraints. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (NJ) 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W.J.M. Levelt. Speaking. From Intention to Articulation. MIT Press, Cambridge 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.M. MacGregor and R. Bates. “The Loom Knowledge Representation Language”. University of Southern California/ISI, Tech. Rep. ISI/RS-87-188.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Marcus. “Generation Systems Should Choose Their Words”. In: Y. Wilks (ed.): Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing. New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D.D. McDonald. “On the Place of Words in the Generation Process”. In: C.L. Paris, W.R. Swartout, W.C. Mann (eds.): Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.A. Miezitis. “Generating Lexical Options by Matching in a Knowledge Base”. Technical Report CSRI-217, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Nirenburg and I. Nirenburg. “A Framework for Lexical Selection in Natural Language Generation”. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pp. 471–475, Budapest 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.F. Nogier, M. Zock. “Lexical Choice by Pattern Matching”. In: Knowledge Based Systems 5(3), 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H.-J. Novak. “Integrating a Generation Component into a Natural Language Understanding System”. In: O. Herzog, C. R. Rollinger (eds.): Text Understanding in LILOG. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H.-J. Novak. “Die LILOG-Ontologie aus Generierungssicht”. In: G. Klose, E. Lang, Th. Pirlein (eds.): Ontologie und Axiomatik der Wissensbasis von LILOG. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. The Penman documentation. Unpublished documentation for the Penman language generation system. University of Southern California/ISI, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Reiter. “Generating Descriptions that Exploit a User's Domain Knowledge”. In: R. Dale, C. Mellish, M. Zock (eds.): Current Research in Natural Language Generation. Academic Press, London 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. Rösner, M. Stede. “TECHDOC: A System for the Automatic Production of Multilingual Technical Documents”. In: G. Görz (Ed.): KONVENS 92 — Proceedings of the First German Conference on Natural Language Processing. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. Schwarze, J. FranÇois. “Heilen und Reparieren”. In: C. Schwarze (ed.): Beiträge zu einem kontrastiven Wortfeldlexikon Deutsch — Französisch. Narr, Tübingen 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  22. N. Sondheimer, S. Cumming, and R. Albano. “How to Realize a Concept: Lexical Selection and the Conceptual Network in Text Generation”. In: Machine Translation 5(1), pp. 57–78, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Stede. “Lexical Choice Criteria in Language Generation”. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL, pp. 454–459, Utrecht 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Stede. “Lexicalization in Natural Language Generation: A Survey”. In: Artificial Intelligence Review 8:309–336, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Giovanni Adorni Michael Zock

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stede, M. (1996). Lexical options in multilingual generation from a knowledge base. In: Adorni, G., Zock, M. (eds) Trends in Natural Language Generation An Artificial Intelligence Perspective. EWNLG 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1036. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60800-1_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60800-1_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60800-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49457-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics