Advertisement

Designing navigational support for educational software

  • Monique Linard
  • Romain Zeiliger
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1015)

Abstract

From a user-centered point of view, learning with hypermedia educational software is mainly a matter of navigation in a corpus of knowledge. However, although navigating obviously requires minimal competences in both computer interaction skills and domain knowledge, yet most current models of navigational support rely on a presupposed degree of proficiency in both domains. We suggest that every learner using a new navigational based learning system needs to be supported by an initial phase of orientation and initiation in both spaces of interface and domain contents. Activity metaphors seem to be a convenient way of supporting learner's cognitive transfer from familiar to unfamiliar domain in particular to help them structure their dynamic progress through the different phases of learning. We will refer to activity theory as a framework to structure both the support of the user navigation and the description of the learning process. As an overall navigational metaphor we will draw on a travel metaphor interpreted as a quest of objects by subjects (Greimas' semio-narrative theory). Considering that navigational issues in learning must evolve from a focus on navigation in the interface to navigation in the domain contents, we propose a three-phases navigational model specific for educational software. Each of the three phases call for different navigational support with Adaptive Hypermedia Systems (AHS) as one of them.

Keywords

Domain Content Intelligent Tutoring System Educational Software User Navigation Interface Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barker,P., (1993), Exploring Hypermedia, Book Manuscript, Interactive research group, The University of Teesside, Cleveland, TS13BA, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Bourdoncle,B.,(1990), Une lecture du recit: l'approche semio-narrative, (in french), Ass. Voies livres, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
  3. Bruillard,E.,De la Passardiere,B.,(1994), Hypermedias et education: des reperes, in Sciences et techniques educatives, V1, Nℴ1, pp 17–37.Google Scholar
  4. Brusilovsky P.L., (1992), A Framework for Intelligent Lnowledge Sequencing and Task Sequencing, in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, proceedings of ITS'92, pp 499–506,Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Brusilovsky P.L.,Pesin L.,Zyryanov M., (1993), Towards an Adaptive Hypermedia Component for an Intelligent Learning Environment, Proceedings of EWHCI'93 East-West International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp 27–38.Google Scholar
  6. Caroll.J.M.,Mack,R.L.,Kellogg,W.A., (1988), Interface metaphors and User Interface Design, Chapter 3 in Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, Holander (ed), Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Cox,R.,Cumming,G.,(1990),The role of exploration-based learning in the development of expertise,Proceedings of Computers in Education,pp 359–364, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.Google Scholar
  8. Dillon,A.,McKnight,C.,Richardson,J.,(1990), Navigation in hypertext: a critical review of the concept, in proceedings of INTERACT'90, Elsevier Science Publisher B.V.Google Scholar
  9. Elsom-Cook,M.,(1990), ECAL: Bridging the gap between CAL and ITS, M. Elsom-Cook and C. O'Malley, in Computers & Education, 15, p 69–81.Google Scholar
  10. Greimas,A.J, Fontanille,J.,(1970,1983),Du sens: essais s emiotiques, Paris: Seuil, t1:1970,t23:1983.Google Scholar
  11. Hammond,N.,Allinson,L., (1987), The travel Metaphor as design principle and training aid for navigating around complex systems. In Diaper and Winder (eds) People and Computers III, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hammond,N.,Allinson,L., (1989), Extending Hypertext for learning: an Investigation of Access and Guidance Tools, in Sutcliffe and Macaulay (eds), People and Computers, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Mulchings, G.A., Hall, W., Hammond, N.V., Kibby, M.R., McKnight, C., Riley, D., (1992), Authoring and Evaluation of Hypermedia for Education, Computers and Education, 18, pp 171–177.Google Scholar
  14. Hutchins,E., (1987), Metaphors in Interface Design, ICS report 8703, Institute of cognitive science, UCSD, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaptelinin.V., (1993), Activity Theory: Implications for Human Computer Interaction, in Human-Machine communication for educational Systems Design, NATO ASI Series 129, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Laurillard,D., (1993),Rethinking University Teachinga framework for the effective use of educational technology,Routeledge, London, New york.Google Scholar
  17. Leontiev,A.N.,(1974), The problem of Activity in Psychology, in Soviet Psychology Vol13, Nℴ2, 4–33.Google Scholar
  18. Leontiev, A.N., (1972), Le developpment du psychisme, Trad. Fr: Paris, Eds. Sociales.Google Scholar
  19. Linard,M., (1993), For a Knowing Subject in Models of Learning, in Communication & Cognition, V26, Nℴ 3/4, 291–320.Google Scholar
  20. Linard,M.,Zeiliger,R., (1995), Designing an interface in an educational context: first steps to a principled approach, to appear at INTERACT'95, Lillehammer, Norway.Google Scholar
  21. Norman,D., (1988), The psychology of everyday things, New York: basic book.Google Scholar
  22. Nitsche-Ruhland,D.,(1994), Aknowledge-based Authoring System for Hypermedia-based Learning Environments, in proceedings of EWHCI'94, V2, Blumenthal, Gornostaev, Unger (Eds), ICSTI, Moscow.Google Scholar
  23. Ricoeur, P., (1977), La semantique de l' action, Paris, Eds du CNRSGoogle Scholar
  24. Rogers,Y.,Leiser,R.,Carr,D., (1988), Evaluating metaphors for use at the user-system interface, in Eurinfo'88, North Holland PublisherGoogle Scholar
  25. Schütz, A., (1932), Le chercheur et le quotidien, Selection d'articles, Trad. Meridienis, Kluicksieck, Paris, 1987.Google Scholar
  26. Serres,M., 1991, Le tiers-instruit, Collection Folio/Essais, Gallimard,Paris.Google Scholar
  27. Subbotin,D.,(1994), User Interface of An Intelligent Navigation System, in proceedings of EWHCI'94, V2, Blumenthal, Gornostaev, Unger (Eds), ICSTI, Moscow.Google Scholar
  28. Uzilevsky,G.,(1994), Ergosemiotics of User Interface Research and Design: Foundations, Objectives, Potential, in proceedings of EWHCI'94, V2, Blumenthal, Gornostaev, Unger (Eds), ICSTI, Moscow.Google Scholar
  29. Vaanaanen,K., (1994), User Interfaces for Hypermedia: How to Find Good metaphors ?, in proceedings of CHI'94, ACM.Google Scholar
  30. Von Cranach, Harre, (1972), The Analysis of Action, Recent Theoretical and Empirical Advance, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monique Linard
    • 1
  • Romain Zeiliger
    • 1
  1. 1.CNRS-IRPEACSEcullyFrance

Personalised recommendations