Skip to main content

Supporting distributed individual work in cooperative specification development

  • Product and Process Design
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems and Data Management (CISMOD 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1006))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper discusses a supporting tool for distributed individual work to develop specifications in cooperative situation. Our supporting tool consists of two parts — one is method base for individual use, and another is a structured electronic mail system for communication use. Method base has various catalogued specification & design methods, so a worker can select a suitable method for his problem domain. It can integrate the products developed by team members with the different methods into one. Our structured electronic mail system supports 1) sending and receiving the products with messages or with comments, 2) automatically notifying the modification of products and the progress status of development activities, 3) composing comprehensive mails by using templates, and 4) storing mails in structured mail folders and retrieving them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. N.S. Barghouti. Supporting Cooperation in the MARVEL Process-Centered SDE. In SIGSOFT'92: Proc. of the Fifth ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Development Environments, pages 21–31, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Booch. Object Oriented Design With Applications. Benjamin Cummings, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. U. Borghoff and G. Teege. Application of Collaborative Editing to Software-Engineering Projects. In ACM SIGSOFT, Software Engineering Notes, number 3, pages A56–A64, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Brinkkemper. Formalisation of Information Systems Modelling. Thesis Publisher, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Coad and E. Yourdon. Object-Oriented Analysis. Prentice Hall, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Curtis. Implication from Empirical Studies of the Software Design Process. In Proc. of Int. Conf. by IPSJ to Commemorate the 30th Anniversary.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.A. Ellis, S.J. Gibbs, and G.L. Rein. Groupware: Some Issues and Experiences. Commun. ACM, 34(1):38–58, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. F. Harmsen and S. Brinkkemper. Computer Aided Method Engineering. In Proc. of the 4th Workshop on the Next Generation of CASE Tools, pages 125–140, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W.S. Humphrey. The Personal Software Process — Rationale and Status. In Proc. of the 8th International Software Process Workshop, pages 102–103, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Lai, T. W. Malone, and K. Yu. Object Lens: A Spreadsheet for Cooperative Work. ACM Trans. on Office Information Systems, 6(4):332–353, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T.G. Lewis. CASE: Computer-Aided Software Engineering. Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Nuseibeh, J. Kramer, and F. Finkelstein. Expressing the Relationships between Multiple Views in Requirements Specification. In Proc. of the 15th ICSE, pages 187–196,1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Peuschel and W. Schafer. Concepts and Implementation of a Rule-based Process Engine. In Proc. of 14 th ICSE, pages 262–279, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Potts. A Generic Model for Representing Design Methods. In Proc. of 11 th ICSE, pages 217–226, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Potts, K. Takahashi, and A. Anton. Inquiry-Based Requirements Analysis. IEEE Software, 11(2):21–32, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Saeki, K. Iguchi, K. Wen-yin, and M. Shinohara. A Meta-Model for Representing Software Specification & Design Methods. In Information System Development Process, pages 149–166. North-Holland, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Saeki and K. Wenyin. PCTE based Tool for Supporting Collaborative Specification Development. In Proc. of PCTE'94 Conference, pages 121–134, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. Smolander, K. Lyytinen, V.P. Tahvanainen, and P. Marttiin. MetaEdit — A Flexible Graphical Environment for Methodology Modelling. In Proc. of 3rd International Conference CAiSE91, LNCS 498, pages 168–193, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. X. Song and L.J. Osterweil. Experience with an Approach to Comparing Software Design Methodologies. IEEE Trans. on Soft. Eng., 20(5):364–384, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Sorenson, J. Tremblay, and A. McAllister. The Metaview System for Many Specification Environments. IEEE Software, 2(5):30–38, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. T. Winograd. Where the action is. BYTE, 13(13):256–260, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Subhash Bhalla

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Saeki, M., Sureerat, S., Yoshida, K. (1995). Supporting distributed individual work in cooperative specification development. In: Bhalla, S. (eds) Information Systems and Data Management. CISMOD 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1006. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60584-3_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60584-3_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60584-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47799-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics