Skip to main content

A physics-based framework for segmentation, shape and motion estimation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Object Representation in Computer Vision (ORCV 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 994))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 182 Accesses

Abstract

This paper summarizes our research efforts towards the development of a physics-based modeling framework that addresses the difficult problems of segmentation, shape and motion estimation in a uniform way. The framework is based on the sophisticated integration of mathematical techniques from geometry, physics and mechanics, with special emphasis on the design of algorithms with close to real-time performance. We demonstrate the usefulness of this framework in experiments involving image and range data, as well as in biomedical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. I. Biederman. “Recognition by Components: A theory of human image understanding”, Psychological Rev., 94(2), pp. 115–147, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Chan and D. Metaxas. Physics-Based Object Pose and Shape Estimation from Multiple Views. Procs. 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, October 94, Jerusalem, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. DeCarlo and D. Metaxas. Blended Deformable Models. Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pp. 566–572, Seattle, June 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. DeCarlo and D. Metaxas. Adaptive Deformable Model Evolution Using Blending. In Procs. IEEE Fifth International Conference on Computer Vision, MIT, Cambridge, June 1995, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. J. Dickinson, A. P. Pentland, and A. Rosenfeld. 3-D Shape Recovery using Distributed Aspect Matching. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, special issue on Interpretation of 3-D Scenes, 14(2): 174–198, February 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. J. Dickinson, A. P. Pentland, and A. Rosenfeld. From Volumes to Views: An Approach to 3-D Object Recognition. Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing:Image Understanding,special issue on CAD-based vision, 55(2), March 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Dickinson and D. Metaxas. “Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Shape Recovery,” International Journal of Computer Vision, 13(3), pp. 1–20, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.M. Hoffmann. Geometric and Solid Modeling. Morgan-Kaufmann, Palo Alto, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. A. Kakadiaris, D. Metaxas, and R. Bajcsy. Active part-decomposition, shape and motion estimation of articulated objects: A physics-based approach. In IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 980–984, Seattle,WA, June 21–23 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. A. Kakadiaris and D. Metaxas. Active Motion-Based Segmentation of Human Body Outlines. In Procs. IEEE Fifth International Conference on Computer Vision, MIT, Cambridge, June 1995, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Kass, A. Witkin, D. Terzopoulos, “Snakes: Active Contour Models”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1(4), pp. 321–331, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Koh, D. Metaxas and N. Badler. Hierarchical Shape Representation Using Locally Adaptive Finite Elements. Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 441–446, Stochholm, Sweden, May 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Kurakake and R. Nevatia, “Description and Tracking of Moving Articulated Objects”, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 491–495, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Metaxas and D. Terzopoulos. Shape and Nonrigid Motion Estimation Through Physics-Based Synthesis. IEEETrans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15(6), pp. 569–579, June, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Chan, D. Metaxas and S. Dickinson. “Physics-based tracking of 3D objects in 2D image sequences”. Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol. I, pp. 432–436, Jerusalem, Israel, October 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Chan and D. Metaxas. “Physics-based object pose and shape estimation from multiple views”. Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol. I, pp. 326–330, Jerusalem, Israel, October 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Park, D. Metaxas and A. Young. Deformable Models With Parameter Functions: Application to Heart-Wall Modeling. Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pp. 437–442, Seattle, June 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Park, D. Metaxas, A. Young and L. Axel. Model-based Analysis of Cardiac Motion from Tagged MRI Data. Proc. Seventh Annual IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, pp. 40–45, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, June 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Park, D. Metaxas and L. Axel. Volumetric Deformable Models with Parameter Functions: A New Approach to the 3D Motion Analysis of the LV from MRI-SPAMM. In Procs. IEEE Fifth International Conference on Computer Vision, MIT, Cambridge, June 1995, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Pentland, “Automatic Extraction of Deformable Part Models”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 4:107–126, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. F. Solina and R. Bajcsy. Recovery of Parametric Models from Range Images: The Case for Superquadrics with Global Deformations. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12(2):131–146, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Terzopoulos and D. Metaxas. Dynamic 3D Models with Local and Global Deformations: Deformable Superquadrics. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13(7):703–714, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Terzopoulos, A. Witkin, and M. Kass. “Constraints on Deformable Models: Recovering 3D Shape and Nonrigid motion”, Artificial Intelligence, 36(1), pp. 91–123, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. A. Young, D. Kraitchman and L. Axel. “Deformable Models for Tagged MR Images: Reconstruction of Two and Three Dimensional Heart Wall Motion”. Procs. IEEE Workshop on Biomedical Image Analysis, Seattle, WA, June, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  25. O. Zienkiewicz. The Finite Element Method. McGraw-Hill, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Martial Hebert Jean Ponce Terry Boult Ari Gross

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Metaxas, D. (1995). A physics-based framework for segmentation, shape and motion estimation. In: Hebert, M., Ponce, J., Boult, T., Gross, A. (eds) Object Representation in Computer Vision. ORCV 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 994. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60477-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60477-4_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60477-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47526-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics