Skip to main content

On the role of splitting and merging past cases for generation of a new solution

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Progress in Artificial Intelligence (EPIA 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 990))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 119 Accesses

Abstract

This paper introduces RECIDE, an implementation of our approach to case-based reasoning. A qualitative and a quantitative metric are used for case retrieval. RECIDE has a library of successful and failure cases. Generation of new solutions is driven by splitting and merging operations on successful cases. Failure cases represent constraints on the application of splitting and merging operators. RECIDEPSY, an application of RECIDE in the domain of psychology, is introduced in this paper. We present the results obtained with RECIDEPSY when splitting and merging operations are considered for generation of a new solution and compare them with the ones produced when solutions are constructed from a single case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barletta, R., and Mark, W., Explanation-Based Indexing of Cases, in Proceedings of a Case-Based Reasoning Workshop, Morgan-Kaufmann, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bento, C., and Costa, E., A Similarity Metric for Retrieval of Cases Imperfectly Explained, in Wess, S.; Althoff, K.-D.; and Richter, M. M., eds., Topics in Case-Based Reasoning — Selected Papers from the First European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, Springer Verlag, Berlin: Germany, 1994a.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hammond, K., CHEF: A Model of Case-Based Planning, in Proceedings of AAAI-86, Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press / MIT Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kolodner, J., Judging Which is the Best Case for a Case-Based Reasoner, in Proceedings of a Case-Based Reasoning Workshop, Morgan-Kaufmann, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koton, P., Using Experience in Learning and Problem Solving, Massachusets Institute of Technology, Laboratory of Computer Science (Ph D diss., October 1988). MIT/LCS/TR-441, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smyth, B., and Keane, M., Retrieving Adaptable Cases: The Role of Adaptation Knowledge in Case Retrieval, in Wess, S.; Althoff, K.-D.; and Richter, M. M. eds. Topics in Case-Based Reasoning — Selected Papers from the First European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning. Springer Verlag, Berlin: Germany, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Veloso, M., Learning by Analogical Reasoning in General Problem Solving. Ph D Thesis. School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. PA. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Carlos Pinto-Ferreira Nuno J. Mamede

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bento, C., Machado, P., Costa, E. (1995). On the role of splitting and merging past cases for generation of a new solution. In: Pinto-Ferreira, C., Mamede, N.J. (eds) Progress in Artificial Intelligence. EPIA 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 990. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60428-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60428-6_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60428-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45595-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics