Skip to main content

How significant are cultural differences in spatial cognition?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS (COSIT 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 988))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this essay, I critically discuss ideas about cultural differences in spatial cognition. A critique of the traditional empiricist framework for understanding the development of cognitive structures and processes is described. An evolutionary framework is provided as an alternative. The ambiguity between culture-related and culturally caused differences is also elaborated. Reasons for cultural universality in spatial cognition are then considered. With these ideas as background, some aspects of spatial cognition are enumerated that I believe are largely culturally universal. Following that, aspects that may show more significant cultural variability are discussed. In particular, the relationship of spatial language to spatial thought is addressed in some depth. I conclude that cultural differences in spatial cognition are not nearly as substantial as is often claimed. Finally, the extent to which cultural differences in spatial cognition are important for geographic information system (GIS) research and design is considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Appelle, S. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The “oblique effect” in man and animals. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 266–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaut, J. M. (1991). Natural mapping. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 16, 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1993). Linguistic and Nonlinguistic Coding of Spatial Arrays: Explorations in Mayan Cognition. Cognitive Anthropology Research Group Working Paper 24. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Max Planck Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campari, I., & Frank, A. U. (1993). Cultural differences in GIS: A basic approach. In Proceedings of Fourth European Conference and Exhibition on Geographical Information Systems (pp. 10–16).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., & Barkow, J. H. (1992). Introduction: Evolutionary psychology and conceptual integration. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 3–15). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couclelis, H. (1992). People manipulate objects (but cultivate fields): Beyond the raster-vector debate in GIS. In A. U. Frank, I. Campari, & U. Formentini (Eds.), Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space (pp. 65–77). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deregowski, J. B. (1980). Illusions, patterns, and pictures. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer, M. J., & Golledge, R. G. (November, 1994). Time in geographic space: Report on the Specialist Meeting of Research Initiative 10 (Technical Report No. 94-9). National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, D. A. (1993). Just what are sex and gender, anyway? A call for a new terminological standard. Psychological Science, 4, 120–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, T. (1970). East is a big bird. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, M. A. (Ed.). (1980). The perception of pictures (2 volumes). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallowell, A. I. (1942). Some psychological aspects of measurement among the Saulteaux. American Anthropologist, 44, 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haviland, J. B., & Levinson, S. C. (1994). Special Issue: Spatial conceptualization in Mayan languages. Linguistics, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazen, N. L. (1983). Spatial orientation: A comparative approach. In H. L. Pick & L. P. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application (pp. 3–37). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, E. R. (1972). Universals in color naming and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 10–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, P., & Kempton, W. (1984). What is the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis? American Anthropologist, 86, 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T., Montello, D. R., & MacFarlane, S. (1985). Personality: Social learning, social cognition, or sociobiology? In R. Hogan & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Perspectives in personality (pp. 201–234). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, H. W., & Pick, H. A. (1972). Cross-cultural and educational aspects of the Ponzo perspective illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 430–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1978). The voyaging stars: Secrets of the Pacific island navigators. Sydney: William Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Williams, J. D., & Dowson, T. A. (1988). The signs of all times: Entoptic phenomena in Upper Paleolithic art. Current Anthropology, 29, 201–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. S., & Downs, R. M. (1989). Understanding maps as symbols: The development of map concepts in children. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 145–201). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, J. (1963). Temne space. Anthropological Quarterly, 36, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, D. M. (1993). Toward a theoretical framework for geographic entity types. In A. U. Frank & I. Campari (Eds.), Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS (pp. 270–283). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montello, D. R. (1993). Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In A. U. Frank & I. Campari (Eds.), Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS (pp. 312–321). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montello, D. R., & Frank, A. U. (in press). Modeling directional knowledge and reasoning in environmental space: Testing qualitative metrics. In J. Portugali (Ed.), The construction of cognitive maps. Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munroe, R. H., Munroe, R. L., & Brasher, A. (1985). Precursors of spatial ability: A longitudinal study among the Longoli of Kenya. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1987). A sense of where you are: Functions of the spatial module. In P. Ellen & C. Thinus-Blanc (Eds.), Cognitive processes and spatial orientation in animals and man (pp. 293–310). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederson, E. (1993). Geographic and manipulable space in two Tamil linguistic systems. In A. U. Frank & I. Campari (Eds.), Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS (pp. 294–311). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederson, E. (in press). Language as context, language as means: Spatial cognition and habitual language use. Cognitive Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick, A. D., & Pick, H. L. (1978). Culture and perception. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception (pp. 19–39). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: William Morrow and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1976). Environmental cognition in cross-cultural perspective. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing (pp. 220–234). Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, M. H., Campbell, D. T., & Herskovits, M. J. (1966). The influence of culture on visual perception. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1990). The roots of thinking. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., & Hurwitz, S. (1984). Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps. Cognition, 18, 161–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, C. M. (1961). Some observations regarding the experiences and behavior of the BaMbuti Pygmies. American Journal of Psychology, 74, 304–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. (1989). Cognitive mapping and the origin of language and mind. Current Anthropology, 30, 518–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissenborn, J., & Klein, W. (Eds.) (1982). Here and there: Cross-linguistic studies on deixis and demonstration. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Andrew U. Frank Werner Kuhn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Montello, D.R. (1995). How significant are cultural differences in spatial cognition?. In: Frank, A.U., Kuhn, W. (eds) Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS. COSIT 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 988. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60392-1_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60392-1_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60392-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45519-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics