Skip to main content

Existential graphs and dynamic predicate logic

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 225 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 954))

Abstract

Using first-order logic to represent the meaning of natural language sentences forces a non-compositional analysis of cross-sentential anaphora and donkey-anaphora. Groenendijk and Stokhof developed Dynamic Predicate Logic, in syntax equal to first-order logic, but with a different semantics. Using Dynamic Predicate Logic, anaphora can be analyzed in a compositional way.

The same results can be achieved using Existential Graphs, developed by C.S. Peirce. The advantages of using Existential Graphs are that Existential Graphs are less complicated and easier to use than Dynamic Predicate Logic, and that Existential Graphs do not require a change of semantics. We discuss two types of anaphora, describe Dynamic Predicate Logic and Existential Graphs, give logical properties of both formalisms, and compare the two approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. van den Berg. Logic, Language, and Knowledge Graphs: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Natural Language Understanding. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. van den Berg. Knowledge Graphs and Logic: One of Two Kinds. PhD thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. van den Berg. Existential graphs and dynamic predicate logic. Memorandum no. 1227, Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Twente, Enschede, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. van den Berg. First-order logic in knowledge graphs. In C. Martín-Vide, editor, Current Issues in Mathematical Linguistics (North-Holland Linguistic Series Volume 56), pages 319–328. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Groenendijk and M. Stokhof. Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14:39–100, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Hintikka. The Game of Language, volume 22 of Synthese Language Library. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.D. Roberts. The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce. Mouton, The Hague, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.D. Roberts. The existential graphs. In F. Lehmann, editor, Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence, pages 639–663. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.F. Sowa. Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Gerard Ellis Robert Levinson William Rich John F. Sowa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van den Berg, H. (1995). Existential graphs and dynamic predicate logic. In: Ellis, G., Levinson, R., Rich, W., Sowa, J.F. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Applications, Implementation and Theory. ICCS 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 954. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60161-9_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60161-9_48

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60161-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49539-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics