Abstract
The prediction of protein structure is an important problem in molecular biology. It is also a difficult problem since the available data are incomplete and uncertain. This paper describes models for the prediction of a particular level of protein structure, known as the topology, which handle uncertainty in a qualitative fashion.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Clark, D. A., Shirazi, J., and Rawlings, C. J. 1992. Protein topology prediction through constraint-based search and the evaluation of topological folding rules Protein Engineering, 4:751–760.
D. Dubois and H. Prade 1991 Fuzzy sets in approximate reasoning, Part 1: inference with possibility distributions, Fuzzy sets and systems, 40:143–202.
Heckerman, D. E. 1990. An empirical comparison of three inference methods. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 4, (R. D. Shachter, T. S. Levitt, L. N. Kanal, and J. F. Lemmer, eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Heckerman, D. E., and Shwe, M. 1993. Diagnosis of multiple faults: a sensitivity analysis, Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Washington D. C.
Henrion, M., Provan, G., del Favero, B., and Sanders, G. 1994. An experimental comparison of diagnostic performance using infinitesimal and numerical bayesian belief networks, Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Seattle.
Parsons, S. 1995. Softening constraints in constraint-based protein topology prediction, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
Parsons, S. 1995. Hybrid models of uncertainty in protein topology prediction, Applied Artificial Intelligence, 9:335–351.
Parsons, S. 1993. Qualitative methods for reasoning under uncertainty, PhD Thesis, Queen Mary and Westfield College, London (to be published by MIT Press).
Parsons, S. and Saffiotti, A. 1993. Integrating uncertainty handling techniques in distributed artificial intelligence, in: Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, (M. Clarke, R, Kruse and S. Moral, eds.), Springer Verlag.
Saffiotti, A., Parsons, S. and Umkehrer, E. 1994. A case study in comparing uncertainty management techniques, Microcomputers in Civil Engineering — Special Issue on Uncertainty in Expert Systems, 9:367–380.
Shenoy, P. P. 1991. A valuation-based language for expert systems, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 3:383–411.
Shirazi, J., Clark, D. A. and Rawlings, C. J. 1990. Constraint-based reasoning in molecular biology: predicting protein topology from secondary structure and topological constraints, BCU/ICRF Technical Report.
Taylor, W. R. and Green, N. M. 1989. The predicted secondary structure of the nucleotide binding sites of six cation-transporting ATPases leads to a probable tertiary fold European Journal of Biochemistry, 179:241–248.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Parsons, S. (1995). Using qualitative uncertainty in protein topology prediction. In: Froidevaux, C., Kohlas, J. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty. ECSQARU 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 946. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60112-0_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60112-0_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60112-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49438-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive