Abstract
In aqueous solution the electron transfer between (reducing) carbon-centered radicals or (oxidizing) hetero-atom-centered inorganic radicals and organic molecules often proceeds by covalent bond formation between the radical and the molecule followed by heterolysis of the so-formed bond between the carbon and the hetero-atom. It is the heterolysis step in which the actual electron transfer between the radical and the molecule takes place. This makes electron transfer a part of the area of (heterolytic) solvolysis reactions. The rate constant for the heterolysis is sensitive to and therefore indicative of the difference in effective electron density or affinity between the radical and the molecule. Factors such as substituents or protonation/deprotonation by which the electron density or distribution is changed strongly influence the rates of heterolysis of the adducts. The observed structure-activity relations for heterolysis of the radical-molecule adducts and thus the electron transfer between the adduct components can be rationalized in terms of the classical solvolysis concepts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
5 References and Notes
For an earlier discussion of inner-sphere electron transfer mechanisms see Ref [2]
Steenken S (1987) In: Fielden E M, Fowler J F, Hendry J H, Scott D (eds) Radiation Research, Proceedings 8th Internat Congr Radiation Research, Edinburgh 1987, Taylor and Francis, London, Vol. 2
For reviews see, e.g., Neta P (1976) Adv Phys Org Chem 12:2
Henglein A (1976) Electroanal Chem 9: 163
Swallow A J (1978) Progr React Kinet 9: 195
Steenken S (1987) J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1, 83: 113
For recent reviews on electron transfer mechanisms see, e.g. Todres ZV (1978) Russ Chem Rev 47: 148
Albery W J (1980) Ann Rev Phys Chem 31: 227
Eberson L (1982) Adv Phys Org Chem 18: 79
Pross A (1985) Acc Chem Res 18: 212
Shaik S S (1985) Prog Phys Org Chem 15: 197
Eberson L, Radner F (1987) Acc Chem Res 20: 53
Chanon M (1987) Acc Chem Res 20: 214
For a discussion of single electron “shifts” in two-electron transfer processes see Refs [4d] and [4e]
Norman ROC (1970) In: Essays in Free Radical Chemistry, J Chem Soc Special Publication No. 24, London, p 117
Gilbert BC (1973) Electron Spin Resonance 1: 206
Steenken S, Davies MJ, Gilbert BC (1986) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2, 1003 and references therein, see also Ref [44b]
Koltzenburg G, Behrens G, Schulte-Frohlinde D (1982) J Am Chem Soc 104: 7311, (1983) ibid 105: 5168
Schulte-Frohlinde D (1983) In: Nygaard OF, Simic MG (eds) Radioprotectors and Anticarcinogens, Academic, New York, p 53
Solvolvsis reactions have in fact been interpreted in terms of electron transfer, cf. Ref. [4b–e]
Murdoch JR, Magnoli DE (1982) J Am Chem Soc 104: 3792
Chanon M (1982) Bull Soc Chim Fr 216
Lewis ES (1986) J Phys Chem 90: 3756
An excellent recent review of solvolysis reactions is to be found in Vogel P (1985) Carbocation Chemistry, Studies in Organic Chemistry, 21, Elsevier, Amsterdam
The validity of reaction Scheme 1 is not limited to heterolyses of covalent bonds to carbon. It covers also cases where both X and Y are hetero-atoms (e.g. oxidation of halides and pseudohalides by ·OH, cf. Ref [40] or where X is a hetero atom and Y is a metal (cf. Ref [41])
For reviews see, e.g. Wardman P, Clarke ED (1985) In: Breccia A, Fowler JF (eds) New chemo and radiosensitizing drugs, Edizione Scientifiche 〈Lo Scarabeo〉. p 21; Wardman P (1987) In: Farhataziz, Rodgers MAJ (eds) Radiation chemistry: Principles and applications, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, p 565
Minisci F, Citterio A (1980) Adv Free Radical Chem 6: 65
Non-“nucleophilic” radicals, e.g. alkyl radicals not substituted by a hetero atom at Ca, do not seem to react by addition to the nitro group (k≤107 M−1 s−1). There is so far no evidence that the radicals add to the benzene ring
Jagannadham V, Steenken S (1988) J Am Chem Soc 110: 2188
McMillan M, Norman ROC (1968) J Chem Soc B: 590
Adams GE, Willson RL (1973) J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 2 69: 719
Jagannadham V, Steenken S (1984) J Am Chem Soc 106: 6542
Steenken S, unpublished material
Janzen EG, Gerlock JL (1969) J Am Chem Soc 91: 3108; Sleight RB, Sutcliffe LH (1971) Trans Faraday Soc 67: 2195; Wong SK, Wan JK (1973) Can J Chem 51: 753
Eibenberger J, Schulte-Frohlinde D, Steenken S (1980) J Phys Chem 84: 704
see Lowry TH, Richardson KS (1981) Mechanism and Theory in Organic Chemistry, 2nd edn, Harper and Row, New York, p 351 ff
Fujita S, Steenken S (1981) J Am Chem Soc 103: 2540
Hazra DK, Steenken S (1983) J Am Chem Soc 105: 4380
Schuchmann MN, Steenken S, Wroblewski J, von Sonntag C (1984) Int J Radiat Biol 46: 225
Steenken S, Jagannadham V (1985) J Am Chem Soc 107: 6818
Jagannadham V, Steenken S (1988) J Phys Chem 92: 111
Steenken S, unpublished material
Adams GE, Willson RL (1969) Trans Faraday Soc 65: 2981; Willson RL (1970) Int J Radiat Biol 17: 349
For a collection of redox potentials in aqueous solution see Steenken S (1985) in: Landolt-Börnstein 13e: 147 or Wardman P (1989) J Phys Chem Ref Data 18: 1637
Bothe E, Behrens G, Schulte-Frohlinde D (1977) Z Naturforsch 32b: 886
Rabani J, Klug-Roth D, Henglein A (1974) J Phys Chem 78: 2089
Bothe E, Schulte-Frohlinde D (1980) Z Naturforsch 35b: 1035
Bothe E, Schuchmann MN, Schulte-Frohlinde D, von Sonntag C (1978) Photochem Photobiol 28: 639
Asmus K-D, Wigger A, Henglein A (1966) Ber Bunsenges Phys Chem 70: 862
Bielski BHJ, Cabelli DE, Arudi RL, Ross A (1985) J Phys Chem Ref Data 14: 1041
Al-Sheikley MI, Hissung A, Schuchmann H-P, Schuchmann MN, von Sonntag C, Garner A, Scholes G (1984) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2: 601
For a review see Ref [3d]
Schwarz HA, Dodson RW (1984) J Phys Chem 88: 3643. Kläning UK, Sehested K, Holcman J (1985) J Phys Chem 89: 760
Fornier de Violet P (1981) Rev Chem Intermediates 4: 121
Asmus K-D, Bonifacic M, Toffel P, O'Neill P, Schulte-Frohlinde D, Steenken S (1978) J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1 74: 1820
Lind J, Shen T, Eriksen TE, Merenyi G (1990) J Am Chem Soc 112: 479
Neta P, Madhavan V, Zemel H, Fessenden RW (1977) J Am Chem Soc 99: 163
Chawla OP, Fessenden RW (1975) J Phys Chem 79: 2693
Davies MJ, Gilbert BC (1984) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2: 1809
O'Neill P, Steenken S, Schulte-Frohlinde D (1975) J Phys Chem 79: 2773; Walling C (1975) Acc Chem Res 8: 125; O'Neill P, Steenken S, Schulte-Frohlinde D (1977) J Phys Chem 81: 31; Sehested K, Holcman J, Hart EJ (1977) J Phys Chem 81: 1363; Sehested K, Holcman J (1979) Nukleonika 24: 941
Steenken S, Koltzenburg G, unpublished results
This number is based on the observation that in the reaction with SO ·−4 k(observed) for formation of optical density at 340 nm (where the ·OH adduct of benzonitrile absorbs) is proportional to [benzonitrile] up to the saturation limit (≈ 20 mM, k(observed)=5×106 s−1), as shown by 248 nm laser experiments
Hasegawa K, Neta P (1978) J Phys Chem 82: 854
Jayson GG, Parsons BJ, Swallow AJ (1973) J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1 9: 1597
Littler JS (1970) In: Essays in free radical chemistry, J Chem Soc Special Publication No. 24. London, p. 383
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer-Verlag
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Steenken, S. (1996). One-electron redox reactions between radicals and organic molecules. An addition/elimination (inner-sphere) path [1]. In: Mattay, J. (eds) Electron Transfer II. Topics in Current Chemistry, vol 177. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60110-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60110-4_4
Received:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60110-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49526-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive