A neural network model for plasticity in adult striate cortex

  • Federico Morán
  • Miguel A. Andrade
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 930)


Recently, outstanding plasticity in the cat visual cortex after birth following a retinal lesion has been described. Previously, we have formulated a neural network model for the development of receptive fields in the mammal visual cortex prior to coherent visual experience. This model is based on self-organization rules, such as Hebbian and anti-Hebbian learning, spread of neural signal among neighbouring neurons, and limitation of the synaptic growth. Here we present how the same model is able to simulate plasticity after birth just tunning the conditions of the simulation to those of a retinal lesion. Thus, our model accounts for the experimentally described long-term plasticity as well as for the short-term one. The significance of the experimental results are discussed in the context of the neural self-organization theory.


Visual Cortex Receptive Field Layer Neuron Shadow Region Inhibitory Connection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Andrade, M.A. and Morán, F. 1993. A model for the development of neurons selective to visual stimulus size. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science. New Trends in Neural Computation J. Mira, J. Cabestany & A. Prieto (Eds.) 686, pp.24–29. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Darian-Smith, C. and Gilbert. C.D. 1994. Axonal sprouting accompanies functional reorganization in adult cat striate cortex. Nature. 368, 737–740.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gilbert, C.D. 1992. Horizontal integration and cortical dynamics. Neuron, 9, 1–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gilbert, C.D. and Wiesel, T.N. 1992. Receptive field dynamics in adult primary visual cortex. Nature, 356, 150–152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Häussler, A.F. and von der Malsburg, C. 1983. Development of retinotopic projections: an analytical treatment. J. Theor. Biol. 2, 47–73.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Linsker, R. 1986a. From basic network principles to neural architecture: Emergence of spatialopponent cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 83, 7508–7512.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Linsker, R. 1986b. From basic network principles to neural architecture: Emergence of orientationselective cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 83, 8390–8394.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Linsker, R. 1986c. From basic network principles to neural architecture: Emergence of orientation columns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 83, 8779–8783.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller, K.D., Keller J.B. and Stryker, M.P. 1989. Ocular dominance column development: analysis and simulation. Science 245, 606–615.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller, K.D. 1992. Development of orientation columns via competition between ON-and OFFcenter inputs. NeuroReport, 3, 73–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morán, F. and Andrade. M.A. 1993. A model for the development of variable sized on-off receptive fields. Proceedings of the World Congress On Neural Networks, 1993 INNS Annual Meeting. Portland, OR (USA); pp. 116–120.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pettet, M.W. and Gilbert. C.D. 1992. Dynamic changes in receptive-field size in cat primary visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 8366–8370.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    von der Malsburg, C. 1973. Self-organization of orientation sensitive cells in the striate cortex. Kybernetic. 14, 85–100.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Federico Morán
    • 1
  • Miguel A. Andrade
    • 2
  1. 1.Dpto. de Bioquímicay Biología Molecular I, Facultad de QuimicasUniversidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Biocomputing GroupEMBLHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations