Skip to main content

BOOTSTRAP: A software process assessment and improvement methodology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Objective Software Quality (SQ 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 926))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The BOOTSTRAP methodology for software process assessment and improvement was initially developed by taking the original SEI model as a starting point and extending it with features based on the guidelines from ISO 9000 quality standards and ESA (European Space Agency) process model standards. The extensions were made in order to fit the methodology into the European context, and to attain more detailed capability profiles and maturity levels separately for organisations and their projects. The methodology was also provided with software tools and cumulative assessment data base support. Recently, the methodology has adopted also features of the becoming new ISO standard currently known as a SPICE Initiative. All this has made the BOOTSTRAP methodology particularly suitable for process improvement with different organisation types and sizes and with different kinds of software processes and products. The paper presents the BOOTSTRAP methodology and in conclusions brings forward especially the improvement related aspects that may set boundary conditions between different software process assessment and improvement approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kuvaja, P., and Bicego, A., BOOTSTRAP: Europe's assessment method, IEEE Software, Vol. 10, Nr. 3 (May 1993), pp. 93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Military Standard. Defence System Software Development. DOD-STD-2167A (29 February 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. ESA Software Engineering Standards ESA PSS-05-0. Issue 2. ESA Board for Software Standardisation and Control, European Space Agency, Paris (February 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Humphrey, W. S., Managing the software process. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc., Reading, Mass. (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Imai, M., Kaizen: The Key to Japan's Competitive Success. Random House, New York (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. ISO 9000-3. Quality management and quality assurance standards. International Standard. Part 3: Guidelines for the Application of ISO 9001 to the Development, Supply and Maintenance of Software. ISO (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. ISO 9001. Quality Systems. Model for Quality Assurance in Design/Development, Production, Installation and Servicing. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva (1989)._

    Google Scholar 

  8. ISO 9004-4. Quality management and quality system elements. International Standard. Part 4: Guidelines for quality improvement. ISO (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. ISO 9126. Information technology — Software product evaluation — Quality characteristics and guidelines for their use. International Standard. ISO (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kuvaja, P., Similä, J., Krzanik, L., Bicego, A., Koch, G., and Saukkonen, S., Software Process Assessment and Improvement. The BOOTSTRAP Approach. Blackwell Business, Oxford, UK, and Cambridge, MA 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paulk, M., et al. Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1, CMU/SEI-93-TR-24, Feb. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paulk, M., et al. Key Practices of the Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1, CMU/SEI-93-TR-25, Feb. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paulk, M.C., and Konrad, M.D., An overview of ISO's SPICE project. American Programmer (February 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. SPICE — Software process capability determination standard product specification for a software process capability determination standard. Document WG10/N016. ISO/IES JTC1/SC7/WG10 (1993)._

    Google Scholar 

  15. Humphrey, W.S. and Sweet, W.L., “A Method for Assessing the Software Engineering Capability of Contractors”, SEI Technical Report SEI-87-TR-23, September 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huda F. and Preston D., “Kaizen”: The Applicability of Japanese Techniques to IT, Software Quality Journal, No.1, pp. 9–26, 1992, Chapman Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bicego A., The SEI Model and the BOOTSTRAP Methodology, in the Proceedings of the Esprit Scope — BOOTSTRAP Conference on Measurement for the Software Industry Today, 17–18 September 1992, Milan, ITALY.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kuvaja P. and Bicego A., SPICE Process Improvement Guide, SPICE Tutorial in the Fourth European Conference on Software Quality, Basel, Switzerland, October, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuvaja P., Software Process Assessment and Improvement — The BOOTSTRAP Approach, in the Proceedings of CQS — European Observatory on Software Engineering: Improving Processes, Products and Services, Rome, Italy, September, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Konrad M., SPICE Baseline Practices Guide, SPICE Tutorial in the Fourth European Conference on Software Quality, Basel, Switzerland, October, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Paolo Nesi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kuvaja, P. (1995). BOOTSTRAP: A software process assessment and improvement methodology. In: Nesi, P. (eds) Objective Software Quality. SQ 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59449-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59449-3_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-59449-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49268-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics