Skip to main content

On transforming intuitionistic matrix proofs into standard-sequent proofs

  • Intuitionistic Logic
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Theorem Proving with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods (TABLEAUX 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 918))

Abstract

We present a procedure transforming intuitionistic matrix proofs into proofs within the intuitionistic standard sequent calculus. The transformation is based on L. Wallen's proof justifying his matrix characterization for the validity of intuitionistic formulae. Since this proof makes use of Fitting's non-standard sequent calculus our procedure consists of two steps. First a non-standard sequent proof will be extracted from a given matrix proof. Secondly we transform each non-standard proof into a standard proof in a structure preserving way. To simplify the latter step we introduce an extended standard calculus which is shown to be sound and complete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. W. Bibel. On matrices with connections. Jour. of the ACM, 28, p. 633–645, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. W. Bibel. Automated Theorem Proving. Vieweg Verlag 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Bibel, S. Brüning, U. Egly, and T. Rath. Komet. In Proceedings of the Conference on Automated Deduction, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 814, pages 783–787. Springer Verlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. L. Constable et al. Implementing Mathematics with the NuPRL proof development system. Prentice Hall,1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. C. Fitting. Intuitionistic logic, model theory and forcing. Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics. North-Holland, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Gallier. Constructive logics. Part I: A tutorial on proof systems and typed λ-calculi. Technical Report 8, Digital Equipment Corporation, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. Gassmann. Eine Matrix-basierte Beweisprozedur für intuitionistische Logik. Master's thesis, TH Darmstadt, FG Intellektik, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Gentzen. Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 39:176–210, 405–431, 1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Letz, J. Schumann, S. Bayerl, and W. Bibel. Setheo: A high-performance theorem prover. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 8:183–212, 1992.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Otten and C. Kreitz. A connection based proof method for intuitionistic logic. In Proceedings Tableaux Workshop 1995, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Schmitt. Ein erweiterter intuitionistischer Sequenzenkalkül und dessen Anwendung im intuitionistischen Konnektionsbeweisen. Master's thesis, TH Darmstadt, FG Intellektik, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Schütte. Vollständige Systeme modaler und intuitionistischer Logik. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. Springer Verlag, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. M. Smullyan. A generalization of intuitionistic and modal logics. In H. Leblanc, ed., Truth, Syntax and Modality, pages 274–293. North-Holland, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Takeuti. Proof Theory. North-Holland, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. A. Wallen. Automated deduction in nonclassical logic. MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. Wos et. al. Automated reasoning contributes to mathematics and logic. In M. E. Stickel, editor, Proceedings of the 10 th Conference on Automated Deduction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 449, pages 485–499. Springer Verlag, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Peter Baumgartner Reiner Hähnle Joachim Possega

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schmitt, S., Kreitz, C. (1995). On transforming intuitionistic matrix proofs into standard-sequent proofs. In: Baumgartner, P., Hähnle, R., Possega, J. (eds) Theorem Proving with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods. TABLEAUX 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 918. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59338-1_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59338-1_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-59338-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49235-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics