Computational methods for aerodynamic design

  • Antony Jameson
2. Valedictory Lecture
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 453)


Drag Coefficient Drag Reduction Lift Coefficient Adjoint Equation Wing Surface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    O. Baysal and M.E. Eleshaky. Aerodynamic design optimization using sensitivity analysis and computational fluid dynamics. AIAA paper 91-0471, 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, January 1991.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Jameson. Solution of the Euler equations by a multigrid method. Applied Mathematics and Computations, 13:327–356, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Jameson. Multigrid algorithms for compressible flow calculations. In W. Hackbusch and U. Trottenberg, editor, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1228, pages 166–201. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Multigrid Methods, Cologne, 1985, Springer-Verlag, 1986.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Jameson. Aerodynamic design via control theory. Journal of Scientific Computing, 3:233–260, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Jameson. Automatic design of transonic airfoils to reduce the shock induced pressure drag. In Proceedings of the 31st Israel Annual Conference on Aviation and Aeronautics, Tel Aviv, pages 5–17, February 1990.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Jameson. Artificial diffusion, upwind biasing, limiters and their effect on accuracy and multigrid convergence in transonic and hypersonic flows. AIAA paper 93-3359, AIAA 11th Computational Fluid Dynamic Conference, Orlando, Florida, July 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.J. Lighthill. A new method of two-dimensional aerodynamic design. R & M 1111, Aeronautical Research Council, 1945Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.L. Lions. Optimal Control of systems Governed by Partial Difference Equations. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1971. translated by S.K. Mitter.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. O. Pironneau. Optimal Shape Design for Elliptic Systems. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Reuther and A. Jameson. Control theory based airfoil design for potential flow and finite volume discretization. AIAA paper 91-499, 32th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exibit, reno, Nevada, January 1994.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Reuther, C.P. van Dam, and R. Hicks. Subsonic and transonic low-Reynoldsnumber airfoils with reduced pitching moments. Journal of Aircraft, 29:297–298, 1992.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G.R. Shubin. Obtaining cheap optimization gradients from computational aerodynamics codes. Internal paper AMS-TR-164, Boeing Computer Services, June 1991.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G.R. Shubin and P.D. Frank. A comparison of the implicit gradient approach and the variational approach to aerodynamic design optimization. internal paper AMS-TR-164, Boeing Computer Services, April 1991.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Ta'asan, G. Kuruvila, and M.D. Salas. Aerodynamic design and optimization in one shot. AIAA paper 91-005, 30th Aerospace Meeting and Exibit, Reno, Nevada, January 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antony Jameson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of M.A.EPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations