Skip to main content

Integrated control and coordinated behavior: a case for agent models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Agents (ATAL 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 890))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents a new architecture for controlling autonomous agents in dynamic multi-agent worlds, building on previous work addressing reactive and deliberative control methods. The proposed multi-layered architecture allows a rationally bounded, goal-directed agent to reason predictively about potential conflicts by constructing causal theories which explain other agents' observed behaviors and hypothesize their intentions; at the same time it enables the agent to operate autonomously and to react promptly to changes in its real-time environment. A principal aim of this research is to understand the role different functional capabilities play in constraining an agent's behavior under varying environmental conditions. To this end, an experimental testbed has been constructed comprising a simulated multi-agent world in which a variety of agent configurations and behaviors have been investigated. A number of experimental findings are reported.

This research was conducted while the author was a doctoral candidate at the Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rodney A. Brooks. A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2(1):14–23, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Philip E. Agre and David Chapman. Pengi: An implementation of a theory of activity. In Proceedings Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pages 268–272, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yoav Shoham. AGENT0: A simple agent language and its interpreter. In Proceedings Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pages 704–709, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Steven Vere and Timothy Bickmore. A basic agent. Computational Intelligence, 6(1):41–60, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Innes A. Ferguson. TouringMachines: Autonomous Agents with Attitudes. IEEE Computer, 25(5), 51–55, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Innes A. Ferguson. Toward an Architecture for Adaptive, Rational, Mobile Agents. In E. Werner and Y. Demazeau (eds.) Decentralized AI 3, Elsevier Science (North Holland): Amsterdam, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Innes A. Ferguson. TouringMachines: An Architecture for Dynamic, Rational, Mobile Agents. Ph.D. thesis, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge UK, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marvin L. Minsky. The Society of Mind. Simon and Schuster: NY, NY, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Michael P. Georgeff. Planning. In J. Allen, J. Hendler, and A. Tate, editors, Readings in Planning, pages 5–25. Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, CA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. David Kirsh. Today the earwig, tomorrow man? Artificial Intelligence, 47:161–184, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. David L. Poole, Randy G. Goebel, and Romas Aleliunas. Theorist: A logical reasoning system for defaults and diagnosis. Research Report CS-86-06, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., February 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Randall Davis and Walter Hamscher. Model-based reasoning: Troubleshooting. In Howard E. Shrobe and AAAI, editors, Exploring Artificial Intelligence, pages 297–346. Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, CA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yoav Shoham and Drew McDermott. Problems in formal temporal reasoning. In James Allen, James Hendler, and Austin Tate, editors, Readings in Planning, pages 581–587. Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, CA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pat Langley. Machine learning as an experimental science. Machine Learning, 3:5–8, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paul R. Cohen, Michael L. Greenberg, David M. Hart, and Adele E. Howe. Trial by fire: Understanding the design requirements for agents in complex environments. AI Magazine, 10(3):32–48, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Martha E. Pollack and Marc Ringuette. Introducing the Tileworld: Experimentally evaluating agent architectures. In Proceedings Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pages 183–189, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Edmund H. Durfee and Thomas A. Montgomery. A hierarchical protocol for coordinating multiagent behaviors. In Proceedings Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pages 86–93, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Paul R. Cohen. A survey of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Pulling together or pulling apart. AI Magazine, 12(1): 16–41, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. David N. Kinny and Michael Georgeff. Commitment and effectiveness of situated agents. Technical Note 17, Australian Artificial Intelligence Institute, Carleton 3053, Australia, April 1991

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Michael J. Wooldridge Nicholas R. Jennings

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ferguson, I.A. (1995). Integrated control and coordinated behavior: a case for agent models. In: Wooldridge, M.J., Jennings, N.R. (eds) Intelligent Agents. ATAL 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 890. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58855-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58855-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58855-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49129-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics