Skip to main content

Reasoning about the safety of information: from logical formalization to operational definition

  • Communications
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (ISMIS 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 869))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We assume that safety of information stored in a database depends on the reliability of the agents who have performed the insertions in the database. We present a logic S to represent information safety, and to derive answers to standard queries and to safety queries. The design of this logic is based on signaling act theory. Two strong simplifications lead to a logic Sā€ with two modalities to represent explicit beliefs and implicit beliefs. Then, we present an operational view of Sā€ in terms of First Order Logic, with meta predicates, which is implemented by a Prolog meta program. It is proved that answers derived in Sā€ and computed by the meta program are identical. This property gives a clear meaning to computed answers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Bauval and L. Cholvy. Automated reasoning in case of inconsistency. In Proceedings of WOCFAI, Paris, France, 1991.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  2. B. F. Chellas. Modal Logic: An introduction. Cambridge University Press, 1988.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  3. R. Demolombe and A. Jones. Integrity Constraints Revisited. In A. Olive, editor, 4th International Workshop on the Deductive Approach to Information Systems and Databases. Universitat Politecnica de Barcelona, 1993.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. R. Demolombe and A. Jones. Deriving answers to safety queries. In R. Demolombe and T. Imielinski, editor, Non Standard Queries and Answers, Oxford, To appear. Oxford University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  5. D. Elgesem. Action Theory and Modal Logic. PhD thesis, University of Oslo, Department of Philosophy, 1992.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  6. P. Gardenfors. Knowledge in flux: modeling the dynamics of epistemic states. The MIT Press, 1988.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  7. A. Jones. Toward a Formal Theory of Communication and Speech Acts. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. Pollack, editors, Intentions in Communications. The MIT Press, 1990.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. G.M. Kupper, J.D. Ullman, and M. Vardi. On the equivalence of logical databases. In Proc of ACM-PODS, 1984.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  9. I. Porn. Action Theory and Social Science. Some Formal Models. Synthese Library, 120, 1977.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  10. R. Reiter. What Should a Database Know? Journal of Logic Programming, To appear.

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Zbigniew W. Raś Maria Zemankova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cholvy, L., Demolombe, R., Jones, A. (1994). Reasoning about the safety of information: from logical formalization to operational definition. In: Raś, Z.W., Zemankova, M. (eds) Methodologies for Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 869. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58495-1_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58495-1_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58495-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49010-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics