Skip to main content

Turning an action formalism into a planner — Essentials of a case study

  • Communications
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (ISMIS 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 869))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We describe notions that are useful for building planners whose reasoning about action matches a given formal calculus for such reasoning. As a planner has to reason under resource constraints, one may require that its plans are just approximately correct wrt. the action formalism. To nonetheless ground its practical reasoning formally, we develop the notion of limited correctness of a planner wrt. an action formalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Biundo. Present-day deductive planning. In C. Bäckström and E. Sandewall, editors, Current Trends in AI Planning. EWSP'93 — 2nd European Workshop on Planning, pages 1–5. IOS Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Brewka and J. Hertzberg. How to do things with worlds: On formalizing actions and plans. J. Logic and Computation, 3(5), 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T.L. Dean and M. Boddy. An analysis of time-dependent planning. In Proc. AAAI-88, pages 49–54, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T.L. Dean, L. Kaelbling, J. Kirman, and A. Nicholson. Planning with deadlines in stochastic domains. In Proc. AAAI-93, pages 574–579, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.E. Fikes and N.J. Nilsson. STRIPS: A new approach to theorem proving in problem solving. J. Art. Intell., 2:189–208, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Genesereth and N. Nilsson. Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, Palo Alto, CA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Hertzberg and S. Thiébaux. Turning an action formalism into a planner—a case study. J. Logic and Computation (Sp. Is. Actions and Processes), 4(5), Oct. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Lifschitz. On the semantics of STRIPS. In M.P. Georgeff and A.L. Lansky, editors, Proc. 1986 Workshop Reasoning about Actions and Plans, pages 1–9, Los Altos, 1987. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. McCarthy and P. Hayes. Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. Machine Intelligence, 4:463–507, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. McDermott. Regression planning. Int. J. Intell. Syst., 6(4):357–416, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E.P.D. Pednault. Synthesizing plans that contain actions with context-dependent effects. J. Computational Intelligence, 4:356–372, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Russell and E. Wefald. Do the Right Thing. Studies in Limited Rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. A. Simon. Administrative Behavior. A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations. Free Press, New York, 3 edition, 1976. Original: New York (Macmillan) 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Valiant. A theory of the learnable. C. ACM, 27:1134–1142, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Zbigniew W. Raś Maria Zemankova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hertzberg, J., Thiébaux, S. (1994). Turning an action formalism into a planner — Essentials of a case study. In: Raś, Z.W., Zemankova, M. (eds) Methodologies for Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 869. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58495-1_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58495-1_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58495-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49010-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics