Skip to main content

CUE: Ontology based knowledge acquisition

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
A Future for Knowledge Acquisition (EKAW 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 867))

Abstract

This paper presents Cue, a knowledge engineering workbench that supports the development of knowledge based systems according to the GAMES methodology, which is also briefly described. Cue contains tools that support the three steps involved in model based knowledge acquisition: model construction, model instantiation and model refinement. Two of the tools that are part of the workbench are described in detail. The first of these, Quote, is an editor for the definitions of ontologies. The second, Quake, exploits the ontologies defined with Quote to elicit domain knowledge in a focused way. In the context of Quake an analysis of possible knowledge elicitation strategies is presented. Finally, the strengths and weaknesses of Cue are discussed and the system is compared with other knowledge acquisition environments.

The research reported here was carried out in the course of the GAMES-II project. This project is partially funded by the AIM Programme of the Commission of the European Communities as project number A2034. The partners in this project are SAGO (Florence, Italy), Foundation of Research and Technology (Crete, Greece), Geneva University Hospital (Switzerland), the University of Amsterdam (The Netherlands), University College of London (UK), the University of Pavia (Italy) and the University of Ulm (Germany). This paper reflects the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the consortium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anjewierden, A., Shadbolt, N., & Wielinga, B. J. (1992). Supporting knowledge acquisition: The ACKnowledge project. In Enhancing the Knowledge Engineering Process — Contributions from ESPRIT, pages 143–172. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boose, J. H. (1985). A knowledge acquisition program for expert systems based on personal construct psychology. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 23:495–525.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chandrasekaran, B. (1987). Towards a functional architecture for intelligence based on generic information processing tasks. In Proceedings of the 10th IJCAI, pages 1183–1192, Milan, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davis, R. (1979). Interactive transfer of expertise. Artificial Intelligence, 12(2):121–157.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Duda, R., Gasching, J., & Hart, P. (1979). Model design in the PROSPECTOR consultant system for mineral exploration. In Michie, D., editor, Expert Systems in the Micro-Electonic Age, pages 153–1674. Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eriksson, H., Puerta, A., & Musen, M. (1994). Generation of knowledge acquisition tools from domain ontologies. In Gaines, B. & Musen, M., editors, Proceedings of the 8th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop., pages 7–1–7–20, Alberta, Canada. SRDG Publications, University of Calgary.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gruber, T. (1992). Ontolingua: A mechanism to support portable ontologies, version 3.0. Technical report, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, California.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gruber, T. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5:199–220.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klinker, G., Bhola, C., Dallemagne, G., Marques, D., & McDermott, J. (1991). Usable and reusable programming constructs. Knowledge Acquisition, 3:117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Major, N. & Reichgelt, H. (1990). ALTO: an automated laddering tool. In Wielinga, B. J., Boose, J., Gaines, B., Schreiber, G., & van Someren, M., editors, Current trends in knowledge acquisition, pages 222–236, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marcus, S., editor (1988). Automatic knowledge acquisition for expert systems. Boston, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Musen, M. A. (1989a). Automated Generation of Model-Based Knowledge-Acquisition Tools. London, Pitman. Research Notes in Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Musen, M. A. (1989b). Automated support for building and extending expert models. Machine Learning, 4:347–376.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Musen, M. A., Fagan, L. M., Combs, D. M., & Shortliffe, E. H. (1988). Use of a domain model to drive an interactive knowledge editing tool. In Boose, J. & Gaines, B., editors, Knowledge-Based Systems, Volume 2: Knowledge Acquisition Tools for Expert Systems, pages 257–273, London. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Neches, R., Fikes, R., Finin, T., Gruber, T., Patil, R., Senator, T., & Swartout, W. R. (1991). Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI Magazine, pages 36–56. Fall.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peirce, C. (1932). Collected Papers of Charles Sounders Peirce, volume 2, Elements of Logic. Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ramoni, M., Stefanelli, M., Barosi, G., & Magnani, L. (1992). An epistemological framework for medical knowledge based systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 22:1361–1375.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Runkel, J. & Birmingham, W. (1994). Separation of knowledge: a key to reusability. In Gaines, B. & Musen, M., editors, Proceedings of the 8th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-based Systems Workshop, pages 36-1–36-19.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shaw, M. L. G. & Gaines, B. R. (1987). An interactive knowledge elicitation technique using personal construct technology. In Kidd, A. L., editor, Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems: A Practical Handbook, New York. Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Steels, L. (1990). Components of expertise. AI Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Steels, L. (1993). The componential framework and its role in reusability. In David, J.-M., Krivine, J.-P., & Simmons, R., editors, Second Generation Expert Systems, pages 273–298. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  22. van Heijst, G., Lanzola, G., Schreiber, A. T., & Stefanelli, M. (1993). Methodological foundations of medical KBS construction. Technical Report GAMES-II/T1.1/UvA/PP/011/1.0, University of Amsterdam and University of Pavia. Submitted for publication. Available from: University of Amsterdam, Social Science Informatics, Roetersstraat 15, NL-1018 WB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  23. van Heijst, G., Terpstra, P., Wielinga, B. J., & Shadbolt, N. (1992). Using generalised directive models in knowledge acquisition. In Wetter, T., Althoff, K. D., Boose, J., Gaines, B., Linster, M., & Schmalhofer, F., editors, Current Developments in Knowledge Acquisition: EKAW-92, Berlin, Germany. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  24. van Melle, W. (1979). A domain independent production rule system for consultation programs. In IJCAI-79, pages 923–925.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wielinga, B. J., Schreiber, A. T., & Breuker, J. A. (1992). KADS: A modelling approach to knowledge engineering. Knowledge Acquisition, 4(1):5–53. Special issue ‘The KADS approach to knowledge engineering'. Reprinted in: Buchanan, B. and Wilkins, D. editors (1992), Readings in Knowledge Acquisition and Learning, San Mateo, California, Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 92–116.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Luc Steels Guus Schreiber Walter Van de Velde

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van Heijst, G., Schreiber, G. (1994). CUE: Ontology based knowledge acquisition. In: Steels, L., Schreiber, G., Van de Velde, W. (eds) A Future for Knowledge Acquisition. EKAW 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 867. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58487-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58487-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58487-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49006-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics