Skip to main content

A tight lower bound for primitivity in k-structures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 820))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The recently developed theory of k- structures, which constitute a general notion of hypergraph, can give important contributions to the analysis of combinatorial and algorithmic problems on graphs. The basic result of this theory is a decomposition of k-structures which generalizes the modular decomposition for 2-structures. This one gives, as a special case, the modular decomposition of graphs, which is a well known technique that facilitates the solution of a certain number of problems on graphs. But, there is a subclass of k-structures to which only a trivial decomposition can be applyed, the primitive ones.

In this paper we solve for the general case of k-structures a crucial question for the usefulness of the modular decomposition: to give a tight lower bound for the size of the biggest primitive substructures in primitive k-structures. We show that in a primitive k-structure on n elements, for k>2, n−k+1 is such tight lower bound. This result shows that bounds for primitivity in k-structures do not generalize the case k=2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Berge. Graph and Hypergraphs. North Holland, Mathematical Library, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Bonizzoni. Primitive 2-structures with the (n−2)-property. Theoretical Computer Science, 1993. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Cournier and M. Habib. An efficient algorithm to recognize prime undirected graphs. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science n. 657, pages 212–224. Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science, WG '92, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Cournier and M. Habib. A linear algorithm to build modular decomposition trees, 1993. Preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Ehrenfeucht and R.McConnell. A k-structure generalization of the theory of 2-structures. Theoretical Computer Science, 1993. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Ehrenfeucht and G. Rozenberg. Primitivity is hereditary for 2-structures. Theoretical Computer Science, 70:343–358, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Ehrenfeucht and G. Rozenberg. Theory of 2-structures, Part I: clans, basic subclasses and morphisms. Theoretical Computer Science, 70:277–303, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Ehrenfeucht and G. Rozenberg. Theory of 2-structures, Part II: representation through labeled tree families. Theoretical Computer Science, 70:305–342, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Engelfriet, T. Harju, A. Proskurowski, and G. Rozenberg. Survey on graphs as 2-structures and parallel complexity of decomposition. Technical Report 93-06, University of Leiden, Department of Computer Science, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Golumbic. Algorithmic graph theory and perfect graphs. Academic Press, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Harju and G. Rozenberg. Reductions for primitive 2-structures, 1992. Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. M. McConnell and J. P. Spinrad. Linear-time modular decomposition and efficient transitive orientation of undirected graphs, 1994. Proceedings, ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. H. Moehring. Almost all comparability graphs are UPO. Discr. Math., 50:63–70, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. H. Moehring. Algorithmic aspects of comparability graphs and interval graphs. Graphs and Orders, 00:41–101, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. H. Moehring and F.J. Radermacher. Substitution decomposition and connections with combinatorial optimization. Ann. Discrete Math., 19:257–356, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. H. Schmerl and W.T. Trotter. Critically indecomposable partially ordered sets, graphs, tournaments and other binary relational structures. Discrete Mathematics, 113:191–205, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Spinrad. On comparability and permutation graphs. Siam J. Computing, 14:658–670, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Spinrad and J. Valdes. Recognition and isomorphism of two dimensional partial orders. In Lecture Notes in Computer Sience n. 154, pages 676–686. 10th Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Valdes, R. E. Tarjan, and E. L. Lawler. The recognition of series-parallel digraphs. Siam J. Computing, 11:298–313, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Serge Abiteboul Eli Shamir

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bonizzoni, P. (1994). A tight lower bound for primitivity in k-structures. In: Abiteboul, S., Shamir, E. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 820. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58201-0_98

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58201-0_98

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58201-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48566-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics