Skip to main content

A computer-checked verification of Milner's scheduler

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Theoretical Aspects of Computer Software (TACS 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 789))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present an equational verification of Milner's scheduler, which we checked by computer. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the scheduler is proof-checked for a general number n of scheduled processes.

The work of the first author took place in the context of EC Basic Research Action 7166 concur 2. The work of the second author is supported by the Netherlands Computer Science Research Foundation (SION) with financial support of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.C.M. Baeten and W.P. Weijland. Process Algebra. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science 18. Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Bezem and J.F. Groote. A formal verification of the alternating bit protocol in the calculus of constructions. Technical Report Logic Group Preprint Series No. 88, Utrecht University, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Coquand and G. Huet. The calculus of constructions. Information and Control, 76:95–120, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Dowek, A. Felty, H. Herbelin, G. Huet, C. Murthy, C. Parent, C. Paulin-Mohring, and B. Werner. The Coq proof assistant user's guide. Version 5.8. Technical report, INRIA — Rocquencourt, May 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Ehrig and B. Mahr. Fundamentals of algebraic specifications I, volume 6 of EATCS Monographs on Theoretical Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.-C. Fernandez, A. Kerbrat and L. Mounier. Symbolic Equivalence Checking. In C. Courcoubetis, editor, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, CAV '93, Elounda, Greece, volume 697 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 85–97. Springer-Verlag, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.-Y. Girard, Y. Lafont, and P. Taylor. Proofs and Types, volume 7 of Cambridge tracts in theoretical computer science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.J. van Glabbeek and W.P. Weijland. Branching time and abstraction in bisimulation semantics (extended abstract). In G.X. Ritter, editor, Information Processing 89, pages 613–618. North-Holland, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.F. Groote and H. Korver. A correctness proof of the bakery protocol in μCRL. Technical Report Logic Group Preprint Series No. 80, Utrecht University, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.F. Groote and J.C. van de Pol. A bounded retransmission protocol for large data packets. A case study in computer checked verification. Technical Report 100, Logic Group Preprint Series, Utrecht University, October 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.F. Groote and A. Ponse. The syntax and semantics of μCRL. Technical Report CS-R9076, CWI, Amsterdam, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.F. Groote and A. Ponse. Proof theory for μCRL. Technical Report CS-R9138, CWI, Amsterdam, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.F. Groote and A. Ponse. μCRL: A base for analysing processes with data. In E. Best and G. Rozenberg, editors, Proceedings 3rd Workshop on Concurrency and Compositionality, Goslar, GMD-Studien Nr. 191, pages 125–130. Universität Hildesheim, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Helmink, M.P.A. Sellink, and F. Vaandrager. Proof-checking a data link protocol. 1993. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Korver and J. Springintveld. A Computer-Checked Verification of Milner's Scheduler. Technical Report Logic Group Preprint Series No. 101, Utrecht University, November, 1993. Full version.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Milner. Communication and Concurrency. Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Paulin-Mohring. Inductive definitions in the system Coq. Rules and properties. In M. Bezem and J.F. Groote, editors, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications, TLCA '93, Utrecht, The Netherlands, volume 664 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 328–345. Springer-Verlag, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M.P.A. Sellink. Verifying process algebra proofs in type theory. Technical Report Logic Group Preprint Series No. 87, Utrecht University, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. N.V. Stenning. A data transfer protocol. Computer Networks. 1:99–110, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A.S. Tanenbaum. Computer networks. Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Henri Korver or Jan Springintveld .

Editor information

Masami Hagiya John C. Mitchell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Korver, H., Springintveld, J. (1994). A computer-checked verification of Milner's scheduler. In: Hagiya, M., Mitchell, J.C. (eds) Theoretical Aspects of Computer Software. TACS 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 789. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57887-0_95

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57887-0_95

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57887-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48383-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics