Skip to main content

Normal proofs and their grammar

  • Invited Talk 5
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Theoretical Aspects of Computer Software (TACS 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 789))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

First we give a grammatical (or equational) description of the set {M normal form ¦ Γ ⊢ M: A} for a given basis Γ and a given type A in the simple type system, and give some applications of the description. Then we extend the idea to systems in λ-cube and more generally to normalizing pure type systems. The attempt resulted in derived (or ‘macro’) rules the totality of which is sound and complete for type assignments of normal terms. A feature of the derived rules is that they reflect the syntactic structure of legal terms in normal form, and thus they may give us more global view than the original definition of the systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Y. Akama. Number of proofs and tree automaton. manuscript, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H Barendregt. Lambda calculi with types. In S. Abramsky, D.M. Gabbai, and T.S.E. Maibaum, editors, Handbook of Logic in Computer Science, volume II. Oxford University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Berardi. Personal communication, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C.-B. Ben-Yelles. Type-assignment in the Lambda-calculus. PhD thesis, University College, Swansea, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Geuvers. Conservativity between logics and typed λ calculi. In H. Geuvers, editor, Informal Proceedings of the 1993 Workshop on Types for Proofs and Programs, pages 131–156, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Geuvers and M.J. Nederhof. Modular proof of strong normalisation for the calculus of constructions. Journal of Functional Programming, 1(2):155–189, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.R Hindley. The Simple Theory of Type Assignment. Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Hirokawa. The number of proofs for implicational formulas(abstract). In Proceedings of Logic Colloquium '92, volume 36. Janos Bolyai Mathematical Society, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.E. Hopcroft and J.D. Ullman. Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation. Addison-Wesley, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Löb. Embedding first order predicate logic in fragments of intuitionistic logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 41(4):705–718, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almqvist and Wiksell, 1965. Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L.S. van Benthem Jutting. Typing in pure type systems. Information and Computation, 105:30–41, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Zaionc. Word operation definable in the typed λ-calculus. Theoretical computer science, 52:1–14, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Zaionc. λ-definability on free algebras. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 51:279–300, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Masami Hagiya John C. Mitchell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Takahashi, M., Akama, Y., Hirokawa, S. (1994). Normal proofs and their grammar. In: Hagiya, M., Mitchell, J.C. (eds) Theoretical Aspects of Computer Software. TACS 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 789. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57887-0_111

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57887-0_111

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57887-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48383-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics