Abstract
This paper takes the position that software process modelling and information systems modelling are closely related in topic — although research is performed by two rather distinct camps and approaches differ. We think that both fields would benefit from more co-operation. The close relationship between the fields is indicated by a modelling example.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
S. Berdal et al. Modelling an IFIP working conference. Technical Report DAISEE-79, Dept. of electrical engineering and computer science, Norwegian Institute of Technology, 1987.
Reidar Conradi, M. Letizia Jaccheri, Cristina Mazzi, Amund Aarsten, and Minh Ngoc Nguyen. Design, use, and implementation of SPELL, a language for software process modeling and evolution. In J.-C. Derniame (eded.): Proc. from EWSPT'92, Sept. 7–8, Trondheim, Norway, Springer Verlag LNCS 635, pages 167–177, September 1992.
J. A. Gulla, O. I. Lindland, and G. Willumsen. PPP — an integrated CASE environment. In R. Andersen, J. A. Bubenko jr., and A. SØlvberg, editors, Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Proc. CAiSE'91, Trondheim, pages 194–221, Heidelberg, 1991. Springer Verlag (LNCS 498).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Conradi, R., HØydalsvik, G.M., Sindre, G. (1994). A comparison of modelling frameworks for software processes and information systems. In: Warboys, B.C. (eds) Software Process Technology. EWSPT 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 772. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57739-4_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57739-4_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57739-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48326-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive