Abstract
Expert systems use a variety of techniques to reason about uncertain, incomplete, or unclear knowledge. This paper considers some methods expert systems have used to attempt to match human reasoning with and about uncertainty. It discusses MYCIN certainty factors, probability and Bayes' Theorem, Dempster-Shafer belief functions, and fuzzy logic. For each method, the paper suggests how conceptual graphs can be used to implement those representations, using concepts, relations, schemata, and actors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Giarratano, Joseph, & Gary Riley (1989) Expert Systems: Principles and Programming, PWS-KENT, Boston.
Harmon, Paul, & David King (1985) Expert Systems: Artificial Intelligence in Business, Wiley, New York.
Shafer, Glenn (1976) A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Togai, Masaki, Lotfi A. Zadeh, & Piero P. Bonissone (1991) “Fuzzy Logic: Applications and Perspectives” IEEE Videoconferences, Seminars via Satellite, April 25, 1991.
Zadeh, Lotfi, A. (1965) “Fuzzy Sets,” Information and Control 8 338–353.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer-Verlag
About this paper
Cite this paper
Whipple, W. (1993). Expert humans and expert systems: Toward a unity of uncertain reasoning. In: Pfeiffer, H.D., Nagle, T.E. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Theory and Implementation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 754. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57454-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57454-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57454-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48189-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive