Skip to main content

Combine and conquer: A general technique for dynamic algorithms

Extended abstract

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms—ESA '93 (ESA 1993)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 726))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 146 Accesses

Abstract

We present a general technique for dynamizing a significant class of problems whose underlying structure is a computation graph embedded in a tree. This class of problems includes the evaluation of linear expressions over k-tuples from a semiring with binary and unary operators, attribute grammars with linear dependencies, point location in binary space partitions, compaction of slicing floorplans, graph drawing, generalized heaps, and a variety of optimization problems in bounded tree-width graphs. For problems in this class, we support a complete repertory of dynamic operations in logarithmic time using linear space.

Research supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grant CCR-9007851, by the U.S. Army Research Office under grant DAAL03-91-G-0035, and by the Office of Naval Research and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency under contract N00014-91-J-4052, ARPA order 8225.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. Alpern, R. Hoover, B. Rosen, P. Sweeney, and F.K. Zadeck, “Incremental Evaluation of Computational Circuits,” Proc. ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms (1990), 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S.W. Bent, D.D. Sleator, and R.E. Tarjan, “Biased Search Trees,” SIAM J. Computing 14 (1985), 545–568.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. M. Beshers and R. H. Campbell, “Maintained and Constructor Attributes,” Proc. ACM Symp. on Language Issues in Programming Environments, ACM SIGPLAN Notices (1985), 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y.-J. Chiang, F.P. Preparata, and R. Tamassia, “A Unified Approach to Dynamic Point Location, Ray Shooting and Shortest Paths in Planar Maps,” Proc. ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y.-J. Chiang and R. Tamassia, “Dynamic Algorithms in Computational Geometry,” IEEE Proc., Special Issue on Computational Geometry 80 (1992), 362–381.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. F. Cohen, G. Di Battista, R. Tamassia, I.G. Tollis, and P. Bertolazzi, “A Framework for Dynamic Graph Drawing,” Proc. ACM Symp. on Computational Geometry (1992), 261–270.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.F. Cohen, S. Sairam, R. Tamassia, and J.S. Vitter, “Dynamic Algorithms for Optimization Problems in Bounded Tree-Width Graphs,” Proc. 3rd Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization Conference (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.F. Cohen and R. Tamassia, “Dynamic Expression Trees and their Applications,” Proc. ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms (1991), 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.F. Cohen and R. Tamassia, “Combine and Conquer,” Dept. Computer Science, Brown Univ., Technical Report CS-92-19, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Di Battista and R. Tamassia, “Incremental Planarity Testing,” Proc. 30th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (1989), 436–441.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Di Battista and R. Tamassia, “On-Line Graph Algorithms with SPQR-Trees,” Automata, Languages and Programming (Proc. 17th ICALP), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 442 (1990), 598–611.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Eppstein, Z. Galil, G.F. Italiano, and A. Nissenzweig, “Sparsification — A technique for speeding up dynamic graph algorithms,” Proc. IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Eppstein, G.F. Italiano, R. Tamassia, R.E. Tarjan, J. Westbrook, and M. Yung, “Maintenance of a Minimum Spanning Forest in a Dynamic Plane Graph,” J. of Algorithms 13 (1992), 33–54.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G.N. Frederickson, “Data Structures for On-Line Updating of Minimum Spanning Trees, with Applications,” SIAM J. Computing 14 (1985), 781–798.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G.N. Frederickson, “Ambivalent Data Structures for Dynamic 2-Edge-Connectivity and k Smallest Spanning Trees,” Proc. 32th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. G.N. Frederickson, “A Data Structure for Dynamically Maintaining Rooted Trees.,” Proc. ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Z. Galil and G.F. Italiano, “Fully Dynamic Algorithms for Edge-Connectivity Problems,” Proc. 23th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (1991), 317–327.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Z. Galil and G.F. Italiano, “Maintaining Biconnected Components of Dynamic Planar Graphs,” Automata, Languages and Programming (Proc. 18th ICALP), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. G. Jones, “Incremental Compaction of Flat Symbolic IC Layouts,” Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, Technical Report No. UIUCDCS-R-87-1386, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. G. Jones and J. Simon, “Hierarchical VLSI Design Systems Based on Attribute Grammars,” Proc. 13th ACM Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages (1986), 58–69.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Kanevsky, R. Tamassia, J. Chen, and G. Di Battista, “On-Line Maintenance of the Four-Connected Components of a Graph,” Proc. 32th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (1991), 793–801.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. E. Knuth, “Semantics of Context-Free Languages,” Mathematical Systems Theory 2 (1968), 127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Overmars, “The Design of Dynamic Data Structures,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science 156 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  24. M.S. Patterson and F.F. Yao, “Optimal Binary Space Partitions for Orthoganal Objects,” Proc. 1st ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms (1990), 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J.A. La Poutre, “Dynamic Graph Algorithms and Data Structures,” Dept. of Computer Science, University of Utrechet, Utrechet, Ph.D. Thesis, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  26. F.P. Preparata, “A New Approach to Planar Point Location,” SIAM J. Computing 10 (1981), 473–483.

    Google Scholar 

  27. T.W. Reps, Generating Language-Based Environments, The MIT Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  28. T.W. Reps and T. Teitelbaum, The Synthesizer Generator, Springer-Verlag, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. Schwarz, M. Smid, and J. Snoeyink, “An Optimal Algorithm for the On-line Closest-Pair Problem,” Proc. ACM Symp. on Computational Geometry (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  30. D.D. Sleator and R.E. Tarjan, “A Data Structure for Dynamic Trees,” J. Computer Systems Sciences 24 (1983), 362–381.

    Google Scholar 

  31. D.D. Sleator and R.E. Tarjan, “Self-Adjusting Binary Search Trees,” J. ACM 32 (1985), 652–686.

    Google Scholar 

  32. L. Stockmeyer, “Optimal Orientation of Cells in Slicing Floorplan Design,” Information and Control 57 (1983), 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Westbrook and R.E. Tarjan, “Maintaining Bridge-Connected and Biconnected Components On-Line,” Algorithmica 7 (1992), 433–464.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Thomas Lengauer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cohen, R.F., Tamassia, R. (1993). Combine and conquer: A general technique for dynamic algorithms. In: Lengauer, T. (eds) Algorithms—ESA '93. ESA 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 726. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57273-2_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57273-2_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57273-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48032-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics