Advertisement

Critical issues in the evaluation of spatial autocorrelation

  • Yue-Hong Chou
Spatial Analysis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 716)

Abstract

Spatial autocorrelation measures the degree to which a spatial phenomenon is correlated with itself in space. As such, it can be used as an indicator of the fundamental topological structure of the spatial relationship among geographic entities displayed on a map. Statistics of spatial autocorrelation are especially useful for characterizing the spatial pattern in the distribution of any phenomenon in question. This paper addresses three important issues pertaining to the evaluation of spatial autocorrelation: measurement of the study variable, definition of geographic units, and specification of spatial weighting functions. Theoretically, spatial autocorrelation is most adequately evaluated when the study variable is measured in either an interval or a ratio scale and geographic units are better delineated by polygons of homogeneous surfaces based on variables that are significant to the distribution of the study phenomenon. In evaluating spatial autocorrelation, weighting functions such as area, boundary length, distance, and their combinations must be examined carefully and specified whenever necessary.

Keywords

Spatial Pattern Spatial Autocorrelation Spatial Relationship Ratio Scale Geographic Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Y.H. Chou: Map resolution and spatial autocorrelation. Geographical Analysis, 23, 228–246 (1991).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y.H. Chou: Management of wildfires with a geographical information system. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 6, 123–140 (1992).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y.H. Chou: Spatial autocorrelation and weighting functions in the distribution of wildland fires. International journal of Wildland Fire, 2, 169–176 (1992).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y.H. Chou, R. A. Minnich, and R.A. Chase: Mapping probability of fire occurrence in the San Jacinto Mountains, California. Environmental Management, 17, 129–140 (1993).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    AD. Cliff and J.K. Ord: Spatial Processes: Models and Applications, London: Pion (1981).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.F. Dacey: A review of measures of contiguity for two and K-color maps, in B.J.L. Barry and D.F. Marble (editors), Spatial Analyses: A Reader in Statistical Geography, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall (1965).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.C. Geary: The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping, The Incorporated Statistician, 5, 115–145 (1954).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Getis: A spatial association model approach to the identification of spatial dependence, Geographical Analysis, 16, 17–24 (1989).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Getis: Spatial interaction and spatial autocorrelation: a cross-product approach, Environment and Planning A, 23, 1269–1277 (1991).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Getis and J.K. Ord: The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics, Geographical Analysis, 24, 189–206 (1992).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Haggett: Hybridizing alternative models of an epidemic diffusion process, Economic Geography, 52, 136–146 (1976).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. de Jong, C. Sprenger, and F. van Veen: On extreme values of Moran's / and Geary's C, Geographical Analysis, 16, 17–24 (1984).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P.A.P. Moran: The interpretation of statistical maps, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 37, 243–51 (1948).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P.A.P. Moran: Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena, Biometrika, 37, 17–23 (1950)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. O'Loughlin: Spatial models of international conflicts: extending current theories of war behavior, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 76, 63–80(1986).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    W.R. Tobler: A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region, Economic Geography, 46, 234–240 (1970).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yue-Hong Chou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations