Skip to main content

Qualitative operators and process engineer semantics of uncertainty

  • Knowledge Based Systems
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 172 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 682))

Abstract

Dealing with uncertainty is one of the major topics of industrial process modelling. Indeed, it is not always possible to completely specify a given process. One alternative to cope with this problem is the introduction of qualitative representation to model the process. This paper presents a qualitative formalism, based on the process expert experience, for which a mathematical framework has been defined. It is shown that uncertainty is used at three different levels in the proposed approach of modelling. As illustration some simulation results from the manufacturing process of TV-tubes are given and then discussed.

This work has been partially supported by the ESPRIT-IPCES Project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. de Kleer and J.S. Brown. A qualitative physics based on confluences. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 24:7–83, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Delgado, N. Rakoto-Ravalontsalama, and J.L. de la Rosa. Esprit 2428 IPCES: Prototype 3 simulation part. Internal Report 92108, LAAS-CNRS, Toulouse, France, March 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.L. Dormoy. Représentation des connaissances en physique et systèmes experts. In Journées Internationales sur les Systèmes Experts et leurs Applications, Avignon, France, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K.D. Forbus. Qualitative process theory. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 24:85–168, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Fouché, A. Charles, J.-P. Barthès and C. Melin. Qualitative physics: a survey. Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle, 3 (4):11–38, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gensym Corporation, Cambridge, USA. G2 Reference Manual (Ver 2.1), August 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gensym Corporation, Cambridge, USA. G2 Reference Manual (Ver 3.0), July 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Gentil, S. Feray-Beaumont, and P. Caloud. Qualitative modelling for process supervision systems. In 1st European Meeting on Cognitive Science and Approaches to Process Control, Paris, France, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Kamerbeek and J.S. Kikkert. Esprit 2428 IPCES: Process description of prototype 2. Internal report, Philips (PRL and TCDC), Eindhoven, The Netherlands, December 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B.J. Kuipers. Qualitative Simulation. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 29:289–338, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Missier. Structures Mathématiques pour le Calcul Qualitatif, Contribution à la Šimulation Qualitative. Thèse de doctorat, LAAS-CNRS, Toulouse, France, December 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Trave-Massuyes, N. Piera, and A. Missier. What can we do with qualitative calculus today ? In Proc. International Symposium on Advanced Information Processing in Automatic Control, Nancy, France, July 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Bernadette Bouchon-Meunier Llorenç Valverde Ronald R. Yager

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rakoto-Ravalontsalama, N., Missier, A., Kikkert, J.S. (1993). Qualitative operators and process engineer semantics of uncertainty. In: Bouchon-Meunier, B., Valverde, L., Yager, R.R. (eds) IPMU '92—Advanced Methods in Artificial Intelligence. IPMU 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 682. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56735-6_66

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56735-6_66

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56735-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47643-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics