Skip to main content

On the equivalence of two-way pushdown automata and counter machines over bounded languages

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover STACS 93 (STACS 1993)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 665))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

It is known that two-way pushdown automata ate more powerful than two-way counter machines. The result is also true for the case when the pushdown store and counter are reversal-bounded. In contrast, we show that two-way reversal-bounded pushdown automata over bounded languages (i.e., subsets of w *1 ... w * k for some nonnull words w 1 ..., wk) are equivalent to two-way reversal-bounded counter machines. We also show that, unlike the unbounded input case, two-way reversal-bounded pushdown automata over bounded languages have decidable emptiness, equivalence and containment problems.

Research supported in part by NSF Grant CCR89-18409.

Research supported in part by NSERC Operating Grant OGP 0046613.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Chrobak. A note on bounded-reversal multipushdown machines. Info. Proc. Letters, 19:179–180, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Duris and Z. Galil. Fooling a two way automaton or one pushdown store is better than one counter for two way machines. Theoretical Computer Science, 21:39–53, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. M. Gurari and O. H. Ibarra. Simple counter machines and number-theoretic problems. J. Comput. System Sci., 19:145–162, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. M. Gurari and O. H. Ibarra. Two-way counter machines and diophantine equations. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 29:863–873, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. O. H. Ibarra. Reversal-bounded multicounter machines and their decision problems. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 25:116–133, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. O. Ibarra and T. Jiang. The power of alternating one-reversal counters and stacks. SIAM Journal on Computing, 20(2):278–290, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Minsky. Recursive unsolvability of Post's problem of tag and other topics in the theory of Turing machines. Ann. of Math., 74:437–455, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Monien. Deterministic two-way one-head pushdown automata are very powerful. Info. Proc. Letters, 18:239–242, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Valiant. The equivalence problem for deterministic finite-turn pushdown automata. Inform. and Contr., 25:123–133, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

P. Enjalbert A. Finkel K. W. Wagner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ibarra, O.H., Jiang, T., Tran, N., Wang, H. (1993). On the equivalence of two-way pushdown automata and counter machines over bounded languages. In: Enjalbert, P., Finkel, A., Wagner, K.W. (eds) STACS 93. STACS 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 665. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56503-5_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56503-5_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56503-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47574-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics