Advertisement

Meson-diquark bosonization in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio Model and in QCD

  • D. Ebert
  • L. Kaschluhn
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 417)

Abstract

Meson and diquark properties are studied at zero and finite temperature within an extended QCD-motivated Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model using path integral techniques. Furthermore, the extension of these methods to the bilocal case of QCD is demonstrated by considering QCD in two dimensions.

Keywords

Vector Meson Quark Propagator Quark Number Baryon Number Density Path Integral Technique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    D. Ebert and V.N. Pervushin, Theor. Math. Phys. 36 (1978) 759.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. Ebert, V.N. Pervushin and H. Reinhardt, Sov. J. Part. Nucl. 10 (1979) 1114; see also: H. Kleinert, in: Understanding the Fundamental Constituents of Matter (Erice Lectures 1976), ed. A. Zichichi (Plenum, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122 (1961) 345, 124 (1961) 246; T. Eguchi, Phys. Rev. D14 (1976) 2755; H. Kikkawa, Progr. Theor. Phys. 56 (1976) 974.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. Ebert and M.K. Volkov, Yad. Phys. 36 (1982) 1265, Z. Phys. C16 (1983) 205; M.K. Volkov, Ann. Phys. 157 (1984) 282, Sov. J. Part. Nucl. 17 (1986) 433; A. Dhar, R. Shankar and S.R. Wadia, Phys. Rev. D31 (1985) 3256; D. Ebert and H. Reinhardt, Nucl. Phys. B271 (1986) 188.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    R.D. Ball, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A5 (1990) 4391; H. Reinhardt, Phys. Lett. B244 (1990) 316, B257 (1991) 375.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. Kahana and U. Vogl, Phys. Lett. B244 (1990) 10; U. Vogl, Z. Phys. A — Atomic Nuclei 337 (1990) 191.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    D. Ebert, L. Kaschluhn and G. Kastelewicz, Phys. Lett. 264 (1991) 420.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    V. Bernard, U.-G. Meissner and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 966; V. Bernard and U.-G. Meissner, Nucl. Phys. A489 (1988) 647; T. Hatsuda and T. Kuhiniro, Phys. Lett. B145 (1984) 7, B185 (1987) 309, B198 (1987) 126; M. Asakawa and K. Yazaki, Nucl. Phys. A504 (1989) 668; S. Klimt, M. Lutz and W. Weise, Phys. Lett. B249 (1990) 386; M. Lutz, S. Klimt and W. Weise, Preprint TPR 91-12, Regensburg 1991.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    D. Ebert, Yu.L. Kalinovsky, L. Münchow and M.K. Volkov, Preprint JINR E2-92-134, Dubn 134, Dubna 1992.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    D. Ebert and L. Kaschluh, Nucl. Phys. B355 (1991) 123.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    L. Dolan and R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. D9 (1974) 3320.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Lett. B184 (1987) 83; P. Gerber and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B321 (1989) 387.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    R.T. Cahill, J. Praschifka and C.J. Burden, Aust. J. Phys. 42 (1989) 161; J. Praschifka, R.T. Cahill and C.D. Roberts, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A4 (1989) 4929.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    D. Ebert and M.K. Volkov, Phys. Lett. B272 (1991) 86.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    R.T. Cahill, Aust. J. Phys. 42 (1989) 171.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    D. Ebert and L. Kaschluh, Preprint DESY 92-110, Zeuthen (1992).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Ebert
    • 1
  • L. Kaschluhn
    • 2
  1. 1.Fachbereich PhysikHumboldt-UniversitätBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron — Institut für HochenergiephysikBerlin-ZeuthenGermany

Personalised recommendations