Skip to main content

Knowledge representation for an intelligent tutoring system based on a multilevel causal model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 608))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

An explicit representation of knowledge is central for an Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS). In order for a system to acquire the necessary flexibility, its knowledge representation framework should distinguish between several types of knowledge and structure them in layers. Here, we present a method for representing domain knowledge for an ITS, using hierarchical knowledge structures and a multilevel causal model of the domain. The successive levels of this causal model increase in complexity to more closely approximate a complete domain model. The resulting knowledge structures have the flexibility that is needed to invoke a sophisticated instructional session.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R. (1988). The expert module. In Polson, M. C. and Richardson, J. J., Eds., Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 21–53.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kim, N. (1989a). An intelligent tutoring system for physiology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Computer Science Department, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, N., Evens, M., Michael, J. A. and Rovick, A. A. (1989b). CIRCSIMTUTOR: An intelligent tutoring system for circulatory physiology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-Assisted Learning, Dallas, TX. pp. 254–266.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michael, J. A., Rovick, A. A. (1991a). Does use of a CBE program assist students to learn? Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology Annual Meeting. Atlanta, GA. pp. A1115.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Michael, J. A., Rovick, A. A., Evens, M. W., Shim, L., Woo, C, and Kim, N. (1991b). The uses of multiple student inputs in modeling and lesson planning in CAI and ICAI programs. Accepted for presentation at The 4th ICCAL Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rovick, A. A. and Brenner, L. (1983). HEARTSIM: A cardiovascular simulation with didactic feedback. In The Physiologist, 26. pp. 236–239.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rovick, A. A. and Michael, J. A. (1986). CIRCSIM: An IBM PC computer teaching exercise on blood pressure regulation. In proc. XXX TUPS Congress, Vancouver, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wielinga, B. J. and Breuker, J. A. (1986). Models of expertise. In Proceedings of ECAI, Brighton, UK pp. 306–318.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wielinga, B. J., Bredeweg, B. and Breuker, J. A. (1987). Knowledge acquisition for expert systems. In Nossum, R. T., Ed., Advanced Topics in Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 96–124.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Claude Frasson Gilles Gauthier Gordon I. McCalla

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Khuwaja, R.A., Evens, M.W., Rovick, A.A., Michael, J.A. (1992). Knowledge representation for an intelligent tutoring system based on a multilevel causal model. In: Frasson, C., Gauthier, G., McCalla, G.I. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 608. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55606-0_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55606-0_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55606-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47254-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics