Skip to main content

Lexical discrimination within a multilevel semantics approach

  • Short Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends in Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 1991)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 549))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper describes a computational approach to lexical discrimination. A multilevel semantics approach is assumed in which at least two levels are relevant: the lexical level, described here, at which lexical discrimination is carried out, and the logical-interpretative level, at which the sentence interpretation is accomplished within the system domain model. Given that both the lexical and the interpretation level make reference to the same knowledge a strategy is proposed to maintain consistency among lexical discrimination, sentence interpretation and domain model knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Allgayer et al. 89] Allgayer, J., Jansen-Winkeln, R., Reddig, G, Reithinger, N. “Bidirectional Use of Knowledge in the Multi-Modal NL Access System XTRA”, Proc. IJCAI-89, Detroit, Michigan, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. [Boisen et al. 89] Boisen, S., Chow, Y., Ingria, R., Roukos, S., Scha, R., Stallard, D, Vilain, M. “Integration of Speech and Natural Language Final Report”, Report No. 6991, BBN System and Technologies Corporation, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Franconi, E. “The YAK (Yet Another Krapfen) Manual”, IRST Manual, Trento, Italy, 1990. Also as ‘Progetto Finalizzato CNR — Sistemi Informatici e Calcolo Parallelo'.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hirst, G. Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity, Cambridge University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lavelli, A., Magnini, B. “Lexical Discrimination within the ALFresco System”, irsT Technical Report, Trento, Italy, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mac Gregor, R.M., Bates, R. “The LOOM Knowledge Representation Language”, Techical Report ISI/RS-87-188, USC/Information Science Institute, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Palmer, M. “Customizing Verb Definitions for Specific Semantic Domains”, Machine Translation, 5(1): 5–30, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scha, R. “Logical Foundations for Question Answering”, Philips Research Laboratories, M.S. 12.331, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stock, O. “Parsing with Flexibility, Dynamic Strategies, and Idioms in Mind”, Computational Linguistics, 15(1): 1–18, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stock, O. “Natural Language and Exploration of an Information Space: The AlFresco Interactive System”, Proc. IJCAI-91, Sydney, Australia, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Strapparava, C. “From Scopings to Interpretation: The Semantic Interpretation within the ALFresco System”, Proc. AIIA-91, Palermo, Italy, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weischedel, R. M. “A Hybrid Approach to Representation in the Janus Natural Language Processor”, Proc. ACL-89, Vancouver, British Columbia, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Edoardo Ardizzone Salvatore Gaglio Filippo Sorbello

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lavelli, A., Magnini, B. (1991). Lexical discrimination within a multilevel semantics approach. In: Ardizzone, E., Gaglio, S., Sorbello, F. (eds) Trends in Artificial Intelligence. AI*IA 1991. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 549. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54712-6_261

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54712-6_261

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54712-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46443-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics