Skip to main content

A hybrid approach for modeling uncertainty in terminological logics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 548))

Abstract

This paper proposes a probabilistic extension of terminological logics. The extension maintains the original performance of drawing inferences on a hierarchy of terminological definitions. It enlarges the range of applicability to real world domains determined not only by definitional but also by uncertain knowledge. First, we introduce the propositionally complete terminological language ALC. On the basis of the language construct “probabilistic implication”, it is shown how statistical information on concept dependencies can be represented. To guarantee (terminological and probabilistic) consistency, several requirements have to be met. Moreover, these requirements allow to infer implicitly existent probabilistic relationships and their quantitative computation. Consequently, our model applies to domains where both term descriptions and non-categorical relations between term extensions have to be represented.

This work has been carried out in the WIP project which is supported by the German Ministry for Research and Technology BMFT under contract ITW 8901 8. I would like to thank Bernhard Nebel, Bernd Owsnicki-Klewe, and Hans-Jürgen Profitlich for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. Bacchus. Lp, a logic for representing and reasoning with statistical knowledge. Computational Intelligence, 6:209–231, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. J. Brachman. 'I lied about the trees’ or, defaults and definitions in knowledge representation. The AI Magazine, 6(3):80–93, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. J. Brachman. The future of knowledge representation. In Proceedings of the 8th National Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pages 1082–1092, Boston, Mass., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. J. Brachman and J. G. Schmolze. An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science, 9(2):171–216, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Dubois and H. Prade. On fuzzy syllogisms. Computational Intelligence, 4(2):171–179, May 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Y. Halpern. An analysis of first-order logics of probability. In Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1375–1381, Detroit, Mich., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Heinsohn. A hybrid approach for modeling uncertainty in terminological logics. DFKI Report, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Saarbrücken, Germany, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Heinsohn. A probabilistic extension for term subsumption languages. In Position Papers 2nd International Workshop on Terminological Logics, Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, May 6–8 1991. To appear as DFKI/IBM/KIT report.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Heinsohn and B. Owsnicki-Klewe. Probabilistic inheritance and reasoning in hybrid knowledge representation systems. In W. Hoeppner, editor, Proceedings of the 12th German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence (GWAI-88), pages 51–60. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Kruse, E. Schwecke, and J. Heinsohn. Uncertainty and Vagueness in Knowledge Based Systems: Numerical Methods. Series Symbolic Computation — Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1991. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Nebel. Reasoning and Revision in Hybrid Representation Systems, volume 422 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. F. Patel-Schneider, B. Owsnicki-Klewe, A. Kobsa, N. Guarino, R. MacGregor, W. S. Mark, D. McGuinness, B. Nebel, A. Schmiedel, and J. Yen. Term subsumption languages in knowledge representation. The AI Magazine, 11(2):16–23, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Pearl. Probabilistic semantics for nonmonotonic reasoning: A survey. In R. J. Brachman, H. J. Levesque, and R. Reiter, editors, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 505–516, Toronto, Ont., May 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Saffiotti. A hybrid framework for representing uncertain knowledge. In Proceedings of the 8th National Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pages 653–658, Boston, Mass., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Schmidt-Schauß and G. Smolka. Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artificial Intelligence, 48(1), 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Yen. Generalizing term subsumption languages to fuzzy logic. In Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Sydney, Australia, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Yen and P. Bonissone. Extending term subsumption systems for uncertainty management. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, Mass., July 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Rudolf Kruse Pierre Siegel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Heinsohn, J. (1991). A hybrid approach for modeling uncertainty in terminological logics. In: Kruse, R., Siegel, P. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Uncertainty. ECSQARU 1991. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 548. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54659-6_89

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54659-6_89

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54659-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46426-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics