Advertisement

Coherence studies of atomic collisions

  • Rainer Hippler
H Alignment in Atomic Collions; Laser Assisted Collision Processes H.1 Invited Surveys
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 376)

Keywords

Incident Energy Excitation Amplitude Atomic Collision Collision System Internuclear Separation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Hippler, M. Faust, R. Wolf, H. Kleinpoppen, H.O. Lutz, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1399 (1985); Phys. Rev. A 37, 4644 (1987).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Hippler, W. Harbich, M. Faust, H.O. Lutz, J. Phys. B 21, 103 (1988).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    U. Fano, W. Lichten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 627 (1965).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    e.g.,Coherence in Atomic Collision Physics (H.J. Beyer, K. Blum, R. Hippler, Eds.), New York: Plenum (1988).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Blum, H. Kleinpoppen, Phys. Reports 52, 203 (1979); Phys. Reports 96, 251 (1983).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    U. Fano, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 74 (1957).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T.G. Eck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 270 (1973).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Jain, C.D. Lin, W. Fritsch, Phys. Rev. A 36, 2041 (1987).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. DeSerio, C. Gonzalez-Lepera, J.P. Gibbons, J. Burgdörfer, I.A. Sellin, Phys. Rev. A 37, 4111 (1988).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C.C. Havener, N. Rouze, W.B. Westerveld, J.S. Risley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1049 (1984); J.R. Ashburn, R.A. Cline, C.D. Stone, P.J.M. van der Burgt, W.B. Westerveld, J.S. Risley, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4885, (1989).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    e.g., W. Meckbach, R. Vidal, P. Focke, I.B. Nemirowsky, E. Gonzalez-Lepera, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 621 (1984).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    U. Fano, J. Macek, Rev. Mod. Phys. 45, 553 (1973).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Hippler, In: Fundamental Processes in Atomic Collision Physics (H. Kleinpoppen, J.S. Briggs, H.O. Lutz, Eds.), Plenum: New York (1985), p. 181; In: XV ICPEAC Electronic and Atomic Collisions (H.B. Gilbody, W.R. Newell, F.H. Read, A.C.H. Smith, Eds.), North-Holland: Amsterdam (1988), p. 241.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Lilders, Z. Naturforschung 5 a, 608 (1950); Annalen der Physik, 6. Folge, Band 8, 301 (1951).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. Harbich, R. Hippler, H. Kleinpoppen, H.O. Lutz, Phys. Rev. A 39, 3388 (1989).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    I.A. Sellin, J.R. Mowat, R.S. Peterson, P.M. Griffin, R. Laubert, H.H. Haselton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 270 (1973).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Gaupp, H.J. Andrii, J. Macek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 268 (1974).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Hippler, O. Plotzke, W. Harbich, H. Madeheim, H. Kleinpoppen, H.O. Lutz, Z. Physik D (1991), in press; and to be published.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    O. Plotzke, U. Wille, R. Hippler, H.O. Lutz, submitted (1990).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. Hippler; H. Madeheim, W. Harbich, H. Kleinpoppen, H.O. Lutz, Phys. Rev. A 38, 1662 (1988).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Kimura, W.R. Thorson, Phys. Rev. A 24,1780 (1981).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    W. Fritsch, C.D. Lin, Phys. Rev. A 26, 762 (1982); Phys. Rev. A 27, 3361 (1983).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    23.H.J. Lüdde, R.M. Dreizler, J. Phys. B 15, 2703 (1982).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    T.G. Winter, C.D. Lin, Phys. Rev. A 29, 567 (1984).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. Shingal, C.D. Lin, private communication (1989).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. Rapp, D. Dinwiddie, J. Chem. Phys. 57, 4919 (1972).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    C. Gaussorgues, A. Salin, J. Phys. B 4, 503 (1971).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    R. Shakeshaft, Phys. Rev. A 18, 1930 (1978).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    K.L. Bell, A.E. Kingston, W.A. McIlveen, J. Phys. B 6, 1237 and 1246 (1973)Google Scholar
  30. 29. a
    K.L. Bell, A.E. Kingston, T.G. Winter, J. Phys. B 7, 1369 (1974).Google Scholar
  31. 30.
    S.E. Nielsen, J.S. Dahler, J. Phys. B 12, 2435 (1980)Google Scholar
  32. 30. a
    S.E. Nielsen, J.S. Dahler, Phys. Rev. A 28, 3308 (1983).Google Scholar
  33. 31.
    H. Madeheim, R. Hippler, H.O. Lutz, Z. Physik D 15, 327 (1990).Google Scholar
  34. 32.
    B. Van Zyl, M.W. Gealy, Phys. Rev. A 35, 3741 (1987).Google Scholar
  35. 33.
    M. Kimura, N.F. Lane, Phys. Rev. A 37, 2900 (1988).Google Scholar
  36. 34.
    J. Ast, H.J. Lüdde, R. Dreizler, J. Phys. B 21, 4143 (1988).Google Scholar
  37. 35.
    R. Hippler, W. Harbich, H. Madeheim, H. Kleinpoppen, H.O. Lutz, Phys. Rev. A 35, 3139 (1987).Google Scholar
  38. 36.
    D.H. Jaecks, B. Van Zyl, R. Geballe, Phys. Rev. 137, A 340 (1965).Google Scholar
  39. 37.
    E.P. Andreev, V.A. Ankudinov, S.V. Bobashev, Sov.-Phys. JETP 23, 375 (1966).Google Scholar
  40. 38.
    R. Hippler, H. Madeheim, H. Kleinpoppen, H.O. Lutz, J. Phys. B 22, L 257 (1989).Google Scholar
  41. 39.
    G.W. McClure, Phys. Rev. 166, 22 (1968).Google Scholar
  42. 40.
    M.W. Gealy, B. Van Zyl, Phys. Rev. A 36, 3100 (1987).Google Scholar
  43. 41.
    F. Borondo, F. Martin, M. Yanez, Phys. Rev. A 35, 60 (1987); Phys. Rev. A 36, 3630 (1987).Google Scholar
  44. 42.
    R. Shingal, B. H. Bransden, D. R. Flower, J. Phys. B 22, 855 (1989).Google Scholar
  45. 43.
    R. Hippler, W. Harbich, M. Faust, H.O. Lutz, L. Dubé, J. Phys. B 19, 1507 (1986).Google Scholar
  46. 44.
    P.J.O. Teubner, W.E. Kaupilla, W.L. Fite, R.J. Girnius, Phys. Rev. A 2, 1763 (1970).Google Scholar
  47. 45.
    R. Hippler, H. Madeheim, H.O. Lutz, M. Kimura, N. F. Lane, Phys. Rev. A 40, 3446 (1989).Google Scholar
  48. 46.
    J. Macek, C. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 34, 1787 (1986).Google Scholar
  49. 47.
    L. F. Errera, L. Mendez, A. Mera, Z. Physik D, to be published; L. Mendez, private communication.Google Scholar
  50. 48.
    T.A. Green, H.H. Michels, J.C. Browne, M.M. Madsen, J. Chem. Phys. 61, 5186 and 5198 (1974)Google Scholar
  51. 48. a
    A. Macias, A. Riera, M. Yanez, Phys. Rev. A 27, 206 and 213 (1983).Google Scholar
  52. 49.
    H.D. Betz, In: Methods of Experimental Physics, Vol 17 (P. Richard, Ed.), New York: Academic (1980), p. 73; the OBK is known to provide reasonable estimates for the relative capture cross sections which are only needed in this case.Google Scholar
  53. 50.
    Here we used σ oc n−3 α E3/2 since E ≈ n−2, cf., e.g., J. van den Bos, Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam (1971).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rainer Hippler
    • 1
  1. 1.Fakultät für PhysikUniversität BielefeldBielefeld 1Germany

Personalised recommendations