Advertisement

New aspects of simultaneous projectile and target ionization in H0 (0.5MeV/1.0MeV) → He — collisions

  • R. Maier
  • O. Heil
  • R. D. DuBois
  • M. Kuzel
  • R. O. Groeneveld
B Two-Center Problems and Saddle-Point Phenomena B.2 Invited Contributions
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 376)

Abstract

Absolute doubly differential electron emission cross sections for H0 (0.5MeV/1.0MeV)→He collisions have been measured non-coincidently and in coincidence with the outgoing H+. A comparison is given between the coincident and non-coincident cross sections for H0 and H+ impact and PWBA-calculations of the DDCS for electron emission. It is shown that the contribution of simultaneous projectile and target ionizations to the coincident electron emission cross sections is very important. There is some evidence that a great part of these simultaneous ionizations can be explained by uncorrelated simultaneous projectile and target ionizations.

Keywords

Electron Emission Ionization Probability Target Ionization Electron Loss High Energy Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M.E.Rudd, J.H.Macek, Case studies in Atomic Physics 3, 47 (1972); Eds. E.W.McDaniel, M.C.McDowell, North-Holland Publ. Corp., Amsterdam (1972)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    M.E. Rudd, Phys. Rev. A20, 787 (1979)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    H.M. Hartley, H.R.J. Walters, J.Phys. B20 (1987), 3811–3831Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    D.H. Jakubaßa J. Phys. B13, 2099 (1980)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    O. Heil, R.D. DuBois, R. Maier, M. Kuzel, K.-O. Groeneveld, Phys. Rev. A (1990, submitted to be printed)Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    O. Heil, R. Maier, K.-O. Groeneveld (1990, to be published)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    G. Bernardi, S. Suarez, P. Focke, W. Meckbach, Nucl. Instr. Meth. B33 (1988) 321Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Rinn, Müller, Eichenauer, Salzborn, Rev. Sci. Instr. 53, 829 (1982)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables Vol. 18, no. 5, November 1976Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    N.F. Mott, H.S.W. Massey, The Theory of Atomic Collisions, 3. ed. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1965), p. 489Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    M.H.Day, J. Phys. B14, 231 (1981)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    R.D. DuBois, S.T. Manson, Phys. Rev. A35, 2007 (1987)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    R.D. DuBois, A. Kövèr, Phys. Rev. A40, 1989, 3605–3612Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Y. Nakai, T. Shirai, T. Tabata, R. Ito, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, Vol. 37, 1987, S. 69Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Maier
    • 1
  • O. Heil
    • 1
  • R. D. DuBois
    • 1
  • M. Kuzel
    • 1
  • R. O. Groeneveld
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für KernphysikJ.W.Goethe-Universität FrankfurtFrankfurt 90Germany

Personalised recommendations