Advertisement

Newly appreciated roles for electrons in ion-atom collisions

  • Ivan A. Sellin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 376)

Abstract

Since the previous Debrecen workshop on High-Energy Ion-Atom Collisions there have been numerous experiments and substantial theoretical developments in the fields of fast ion-atom and ion-solid collisions concerned with explicating the previously largely underappreciated role of electrons as ionizing and exciting agents in such collisions. Examples to be discussed include the double electron ionization problem in He; transfer ionization by protons in He; double excitation in He; backward scattering of electrons in He; the role of electron-electron interaction in determining beta parameters for ELC; projectile K ionization by target electrons; electron spin exchange in transfer excitation; electron impact ionization in crystal channels; resonant coherent excitation in crystal channels; excitation and dielectronic recombination in crystal channels; resonant transfer and excitation; the similarity of recoil ion spectra observed in coincidence with electron capture vs. electron loss; and new research on ion-atom collisions at relativistic energies.

Keywords

Ionization Cross Section Double Ionization Dielectronic Recombination Double Excitation Target Electron 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. C. Levin, C. Biedermann, N. Keller, L. Liljeby, C.-S. 0, R. T. Short, and I. A. Sellin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 988 (1990).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Z. Smit, M. Kregar, and D. Glavic-Cindro, Phys. Rev. A 40, 6303 (1989).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. H. Andersen, P. Hvelplund, H. Knudsen, S. P. Møller, K. Elsener, K.-G. Rensfelt and E. Uggerhøj, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2147 (1986). For a very recent discussion of shakeoff and the so-called TS-1 process, see the paper of L. Végh and J. Burgdörfer, Phys. Rev. A42, 655 (1990).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. F. Reading and A. L. Ford, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 543 (1987); J. Phys. B21, L685 (1988).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O. Heber, B. Bandong, G. Sampoli, and R. L. Watson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 851 (1990).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. McGuire, private communication; Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1153 (1982); Nucl. Inst. Meth. B 10/11, 17 (1985).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Charlton, L. H. Andersen, L. Brun-Nielsen, B. I. Deutsch, P. Hvelplund, F. M. Jacobsen, H. Knudsen, G. Larrichia, M. R. Poulsen, and J. O. Pedersen, J. Phys. B21, L545 (1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Pálinkás, R. Schuch, H. Cederquist, and O. Gustafsson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2464 (1989); J. Briggs and K. Taulbjerg, J. Phys. B 12, 2569 (1979).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Giese, M Schulz, J. Swenson, H. Schöne, M. Benhenni, S. Varghes, C. Vane, P. Dittner, S. Shafroth, and S. Datz, to be published in Phys. Rev. A; corrected data of J. O. P. Pedersen and P. Hvelplund, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2373 (1989); W. Fritsch and C. D. Lin, to be published in Phys. Rev. A.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. Heil, A. Kövér, G. Szabô, L. Gulyás, K. Tökési, J. Kemmler, H. Rothard, D. Berényi, and K. O. Groeneveld, Inst. für Kernforschung der Uni. Frankfurt/M Annual Report No. IKF-47, p. 19 (1987), and J. Phys. B 21, 3231 (1988); H. Hartley and H. Walters, J. Phys. B 20, 3811 1987); J. Wang and J. Burgdörfer, private communication, and to be published.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Burgdörfer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 374 (1983); J. Burgdörfer, M. Breinig, S. B. Elston, and I. A. Sellin, Phys Rev. A 28, 3277 1983); L. Gulyas, A. Kövér, G. Szabô, D. Berényi, L. Sarkadi, J. Pálinkás, and T. Vajnai, “Cusp Inversion in the Electron Loss Process”, ECAMP — 3, Bordeaux, 1989; J. Burgdörfer and G. Szábo, to be published.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H.-P. Hülskötter, W. E. Meyerhof, E. Dillard, and N. Guardala, Phys. Rev. Letters 63, 1938 (1989.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. J. M. Zouros, D. H. Lee, and P. Richard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2261 (1989); S. J. Goett and D. H. Sampson, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 29, 535 (1983).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. Claytor, B. Feinberg, H. Gould, C. Bemis, J. Gomez del Campo, C. Ludemann, and C. R. Vane, Phys. Rev. Letters 61, 2081 (1988).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Datz, C.D. Moak, O.H. Crawford, H.F. Krause, P.F. Dittner, J. Gomez del Campo, J.A. Biggerstaff, P.D. Miller, P. Hvelplund, and H. Knudsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 843 (1978); Y. Iwata, K. Komaki, Y. Yamazaki, M. Sekiguchi, T. Hattori, T. Hasegawa and F. Fujimoto, Nucl. Inst. Meth. B48, 163 (1990).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Kimura, J. Gibbons, S. Elston, C. Biedermann, R. DeSerio, N. Keller, J. Levin, M. Breinig, J. Burgdörfer, and I. Sellin, submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. Andersen, P. Hvelplund, H. Knudsen, and P. Kvistgaard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2656 (1989).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Datz, C. Vane, P. Dittner, J. Giese, J. Gomez del Campo, N. Jones, H. Krause, P. Miller, M. Schulz, H. Schöne, and T. Rosseel, Nucl. Inst. Meth. B48, 114 (1990).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    See for example the excellent reviews by J. A. Tanis, “Electron Transfer and Projectile Excitation in Single Collisions”, Nucl. Inst. Meth. A262, 52 (1987); and in the Proceedings of the X-90 International Conference on X-rays and Inner Shell Ionization, to be published in Nucl. Inst. Meth.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Levin, C.-S. O. H. Cederquist, C. Biedermann, and I. Sellin, Rapid Communications, Phys Rev. A38, 2674 (1988).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Report of the Panel on Relativistic Atomic Collisions, Future Opportunities in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Sciences Workshop, November 7, 1989. Panel members: C. Bottcher, H. Bryant, H. Gould, W. Mey erhof, P. Mohr, and W. Smith. See also R. Anholt and H. Gould, in Advances in Atomic and Molecular Physics, D. Bates and B. Bederson, eds., (Academic Press, New York, 1986) Vol. 22, p. 315.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Participants include S. Datz, C. Vane, P. Dittner, H. Gould, H. Knudsen, P. Hvelplund, R. Schuch et al. The theoretical calculations displayed in Fig. 15 are from M. J. Rhoades-Brown, C. Bottcher, and M. Strayer, Physical Review A 40, 2831 (1989), and Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B43, 301 (1989).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan A. Sellin
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxville
  2. 2.Oak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations