Skip to main content

Extensions to the rippling-out tactic for guiding inductive proofs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
10th International Conference on Automated Deduction (CADE 1990)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 449))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In earlier papers we described a technique for automatically constructing inductive proofs, using a heuristic search control tactic called rippling-out. Further testing on harder examples has shown that the rippling-out tactic significantly reduces the search for a proof of a wide variety of theorems, with relatively few cases in which all proofs were pruned. However, it also proved necessary to generalise and extend rippling-out in various ways. Each of the various extensions are described with examples to illustrate why they are needed, but it is shown that the spirit of the original rippling-out tactic has been retained.

The research reported in this paper was supported by SERC grant GR/E/44598, and an SERC Senior Fellowship to the first author. We wish to thank our colleagues in the Edinburgh Mathematical Reasoning Group and three anonymous referees for feedback on this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Aubin. Some generalization heuristics in proofs by induction. In Actes du Colloque Construction: Amelioration et verification de Programmes, Institut de recherche d'informatique et d'automatique, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.S. Boyer and J.S. Moore. A Computational Logic. Academic Press, 1979. ACM monograph series.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Bundy. The use of explicit plans to guide inductive proofs. In 9th Conference on Automated Deduction, pages 111–120, Springer-Verlag, 1988. Longer version available from Edinburgh as Research Paper No. 349.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Bundy, F. van Harmelen, J. Hesketh, and A. Smaill. Experiments with Proof Plans for Induction. Research Paper 413, Dept. of Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh, 1988. To appear in JAR.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.L. Constable, S.F. Allen, H.M. Bromley, et al. Implementing Mathematics with the Nuprl Proof Development System. Prentice Hall, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Mark E. Stickel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bundy, A., van Harmelen, F., Smaill, A., Ireland, A. (1990). Extensions to the rippling-out tactic for guiding inductive proofs. In: Stickel, M.E. (eds) 10th International Conference on Automated Deduction. CADE 1990. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 449. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-52885-7_84

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-52885-7_84

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-52885-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47171-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics