Skip to main content

Modes of analogy

  • Submitted Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Analogical and Inductive Inference (AII 1989)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 397))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

There are two main conclusions that emerge from this paper, besides clearing up some of the confusion that invariably results from not distinguishing different modes of “analogy” and talking about it as if it were just one process. First of all, I have emphasized the underlying process of interpretation that plays a key role in analogy by rendition and certain proportional analogy relations. In understanding and modeling this process lies one half of the problem of cognition. (The other half has to do with the process of accommodation, or what is more familiarly known as “learning.”).

The second conclusion concerns predictive analogy. The problem of justification of predictive analogy is merely a red herring, since no justification can ever be found. On the other hand, the real problem lies in understanding how our vaguely held background knowledge can sprout the necessary premises for analogical inferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Achinstein P., 1963, “Variety and Analogy in Confirmation Theory”, Philosophy of Science 30, No. 3, July 1963, pp. 207–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi J., 1964, “Analogies as Generalizations”, Philosophy of Science 31, No. 4, Oct. 1964, pp. 351–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black M., 1962a, Models and Metaphors, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell J.G., 1983, “Learning by Analogy: Formulating and Generalizing Plans from Past Experience”, in R.S. Michalski et al. (eds.) Machine Learning, pp. 137–161, Tioga Publishing Co., Palo Alto, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell J.G., 1986, “Derivational Analogy: A Theory of Reconstructive Problem Solving and Expertise Acquisition” in R.S. Michalski et al. (eds.) Machine Learning Vol. II, pp. 371–392, Morgan Kaufmann, Inc., Los Altos, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap R., 1962, Logical Foundations of Probability, The Univ. of Chicago Press, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap R., 1963, “Variety, Analogy, and Periodicity in Inductive Logic”, Philosophy of Science 30, No. 3, July 1963, pp. 222–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies T.R. and Russell S.J., 1987, “A Logical Approach to Reasoning by Analogy”, Proc. of IJCAI 87, pp. 264–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erman L.D., Hayes-Roth F., Lesser V.R., and Reddy D.R., 1980, “The Hearsay-II Speech-Understanding System: Integrating Knowledge to Resolve Uncertainty”, Computing Surveys 12, pp. 213–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans T.G., 1963, A Heuristic Program to Solve Geometric-Analogy Problems, Ph.D., Dissertation, Dept. of Mathematics, M.I.T., Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner D., 1982, “Are Scientific Analogies Metaphors?”, in D.S. Miall (ed.) Metaphor: Problems and Perspectives, Harvester Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner D., 1983, “Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy”, Cognitive Science 7, pp. 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner D. and Gentner D.R., 1983, “Flowing Water or Teeming Crowds: Mental Models of Electricity”, in D. Gentner & A.L. Stevens (eds.) Mental Models, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 99–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gick M.L. and Holyoak K.J., 1980, “Analogical Problem Solving”, Cognitive Psychology 12, pp. 306–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gick M.L. and Holyoak K.J., 1983, “Schema Induction and Analogical Transfer”, Cognitive Psychology 15, pp. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon W.J.J., 1961, Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity, Collier Books Edition (1968), New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiner R., 1985, Learning by Understanding Analogies, Ph.D. Dissertation, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber H.E., 1978, “Darwin's ‘Tree of Nature’ and Other Images of Wide Scope”, in J. Wechsler (ed.) On Aesthetics in Science, MIT Press (1978), Cambridge, Mass., pp. 121–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halasz F. & Moran T.P., 1982, “Analogies Considered Harmful”, ACM Proc. of Human Factors in Computer Systems, pp. 383–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall R.P., 1988, “Computational Approaches to Analogical Reasoning: A Comparative Analysis”, to appear in Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrod R., 1956, Foundations of Inductive Logic, MacMillan, republished 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse M.B., 1959a, Analogy-Structure in a Thesaurus, Technical Report ML 101, The Cambridge Language Research Unit, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse M.B., 1959b, “On Defining Analogy”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society LX, pp. 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse M.B., 1964, “Analogy and Confirmation Theory”, Philosophy of Science 31, No. 4, Oct. 1964, pp. 319–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse M.B., 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, Univ. of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Ind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse M.B., 1980, Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science, Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomigton, Ind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter D.R., 1981, “Metamagical Themas: Roles and Analogies in Human and Machine Thought,” Scientific American, Vol. 245, No. 3, Sept. 1981; reprinted with some additional material as “Analogies and Role in Human and Machine Thinking”, in Metamagical Themas: Questing for the Essence of Mind and Pattern, Basic Books, Inc. (1985), New York; Chap. 24 (pp. 547–603).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter D.R., 1984, “The Copycat Project: An Experiment in Nondeterminism and Creative Analogies,” A.I. Memo 755, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland J.H., Holyoak K.J., Nisbett R.E. and Thagard P.R., 1986, Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indurkhya B., 1987, “Approximate Semantic Transference: A Computational Theory of Metaphors and Analogies”, Cognitive Science 11, pp. 445–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indurkhya B., 1989, “Some Remarks on Rationality of Induction,” submitted to Synthese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indurkhya B., forthcoming, Metaphor and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedar-Cabelli S., 1985, “Purpose-Directed Analogy,” ML-TR-1, Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes J.M., 1921, A Treatise on Probability, MacMillan & Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling R.E., 1971, Reasoning by Analogy with Application to Heuristic Problem-Solving: A Case Study, Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Computer Science, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler A., 1964, The Act of Creation, Hutchinsons of London; 2nd Danube ed., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer S.K., 1967, An Introduction to Symbolic Logic, 3rd revised ed., Dover Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat D., Prakash M., and Shepherd M., 1986, “CYC: Using Common Sense Knowledge to Overcome Brittleness and Knowledge Acquisition Bottlenecks”, AI Magazine, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hara S., in preparation, “An Algebraic Approach to Proportional Analogy,” Technical Report, Computer Science Department, Boston University, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya G., 1945, How to Solve it, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, (2en ed. 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur P., 1976, Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning, The Texas Christian Univ. Press, Fort Worth, Tex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riseman E.M. and Hanson A.R., 1987, “A Methodology for the Development of General Knowledge-Based Vision Systems”, in M.A. Arbib and A.R. Hanson (eds.) Vision, Brain, and Cooperative Computation, MIT Press (Bradford Books), Cambridge, Mass., pp. 285–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell S.J., 1987, Analogical and Inductive Reasoning, Ph.D. Thesis, Computer Science Dept., Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön D.A., 1963, Displacement of Concepts, Humanities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön D.A., 1979, “Generative Metaphor: A Perspective on Problem-Setting in Social Policy”, in A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge Univ. Press (1979), Cambridge, UK, pp. 154–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright G.H., 1965, The Logical Problem of Induction, 2nd revised ed., Oxford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzenfeld J.S., 1984, “Valid Reasoning by Analogy”, Phil. of Science 51, pp. 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weymouth T.E., 1986, Using Object Descriptions in a Schema Network for Machine Vision, Ph.D. Dissertation Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson P.R., 1964, “On the Argument by Analogy”, Philosophy of Science 31, No. 1, Jan. 1964, pp. 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston P.H., 1978, “Learning by Creatifying Transfer Frames”, Artificial Intelligence 10, pp. 147–172.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Klaus P. Jantke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Indurkhya, B. (1989). Modes of analogy. In: Jantke, K.P. (eds) Analogical and Inductive Inference. AII 1989. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 397. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-51734-0_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-51734-0_63

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-51734-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46798-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics