Advertisement

A learning-based approach to meta-data evolution in an object-oriented database

  • Dennis McLeod
Integration Of Existing Systems
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 334)

Keywords

Type Object Evolution Case Binary Relationship VLDB Endowment Evolution Heuristic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    H. Afsarmanesh, D. Knapp, D. McLeod, and A. Parker. An extensible, object-oriented approach to databases for vlsi/cad. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases, VLDB Endowment, August 1985.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    T. Andrews and C. Harris. Combining language and database advances in an object-oriented development environment. In Proceedings of the Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 430–440, ACM, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    R. Balzer. Automated enhancement of knowledge representations. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 203–207, August 1985.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Banerjee, H. Chou, J. Garza, W. Kim, D. Woelk, N. Ballou, and H. Kim. Data model issues for object-oriented applications. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 5(1):3–26, January 1987.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. Banerjee and W. Kim. Semantics and implementation of schema envolution in object-oriented databases. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 311–322, ACM SIGMOD, May 1987.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Brodie and J. Mylopoulos (Editors). On Knowledge Base Management Systems. Springer-Verlag, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    E. F. Codd. Extending the database relational model to capture more meaning. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 4(4):397–434, 1979.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Hammer and D. McLeod. Database description with sdm: a semantic database model. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 6(3):351–386, September 1981.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    D. Heimbigner and D. McLeod. A federated architecture for information systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 3(3):253–278, July 1985.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    R. Hull and R. King. Semantic database modeling: survey, applications, and research issues. ACM Computing Surveys, 19(3):201–260, September 1987.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    W. Kent. Limitations of record-oriented information models. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 4:107–131, March 1979.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    W. Kim and H. Chou. Versions of schema for object-oriented databases. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases, VLDB Endowment, IEEE, ACM SIGMOD, September 1988.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Q. Li and D. McLeod. Object flavor evolution in an object-oriented database system. In Proceedings of the Conference on Office Information System, ACM, March 1988.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Q. Li and D. McLeod. Supporting object flavor evolution through learning in an object-oriented database system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Expert Database Systems, April 1988.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    P. Lyngbaek and D. McLeod. Object sharing in distributed information systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 2(2):96–122, April 1984.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    R. Michalski, J. Carbonell, and T. Mitchell (Editors). Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach (Volume 1). Tioga Publishing Company, 1983.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    R. Michalski, J. Carbonell, and T. Mitchell (Editors). Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach (Volume 2). Morgan Kaufmann, 1986.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    K. Narayanaswamy and K. V. Bapa Rao. An incremental mechanism for schema evolution in engineering domains. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering, pages 294–301, IEEE, January 1988.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Vbase Reference Manual — Vbase Release 1.0. Ontologic, Inc., 47 Manning Road, Billerica MA, 1987.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    D. J. Penney and J. Stein. Class modification in the gemstone object-oriented dbms. In Proceedings of the Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 111–117, 1987.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    A. Purdy, B. Schuchardt, and D. Maier. Integrating an object server with other worlds. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 5(1):27–47, January 1987.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    A. H. Skarra and S. B. Zdonik. The management of changing types in an object-oriented database. In Proceedings of the Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Langusges, and Applications, pages 483–495, 1986.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    K. Smith and S. Zdonik. Intermedia: a case study of the differences between relational and object-oriented database systems. In Proceedings of the Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Langusges, and Applications, pages 452–465, ACM, 1987.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    M. Stefik and D. Bobrow. Object-oriented programming: themes and variations. AI Magazine, 6(4):40–62, 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis McLeod
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations