Skip to main content

Factorizing Equivalent Variable Pairs in ROBDD-Based Implementations of Pos

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algebraic Methodology and Software Technology (AMAST 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1548))

Abstract

The subject of groundness analysis for (constraint) logic programs has been widely studied, and interesting domains have been proposed. Pos has been recognized as the most suitable domain for capturing the kind of dependencies arising in groundness analysis, and Reduced Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams (ROBDDs) are generally accepted to be the most efficient representation for Pos. Unfortunately, the size of an ROBDDs is, in the worst case, exponential in the number of variables it depends upon. Earlier work [2] has shown that a hybrid representation that separates the definite information from the dependency information is considerably more efficient than keeping the two together. The aim of the present paper is to push this idea further, also separating out certain dependency information, in particular all pairs of variables that are always either both ground or neither ground. We find that this new hybrid representation is a significant improvement over previous work.

Much of this work was supported by EPSRC grant GR/L19515.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. Armstrong, K. Marriott, P. Schachte, and H. Søndergaard. Two classes of Boolean functions for dependency analysis. Science of Computer Programming, 31(1):3–45, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Bagnara. A reactive implementation of Pos using ROBDDs. In H. Kuchen and S. D. Swierstra, editors, Programming Languages: Implementations, Logics and Programs, Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium, volume 1140 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 107–121, Aachen, Germany, 1996. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Bagnara. Data-Flow Analysis for Constraint Logic-Based Languages. PhD thesis, Dipartimento di Informatica, Università di Pisa, Corso Italia 40, I-56125 Pisa, Italy, March 1997. Printed as Report TD-1/97.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Bagnara and P. Schachte. Efficient implementation of Pos. Technical Report 98/5, Department of Computer Science, The University of Melbourne, Australia, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Bigot, S. K. Debray, and K. Marriott. Understanding finiteness analysis using abstract interpretation. In K. Apt, editor, Logic Programming: Proceedings of the Joint International Conference and Symposium on Logic Programming, MIT Press Series in Logic Programming, pages 735–749, Washington, USA, 1992. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. E. Bryant. Graph-based algorithms for Boolean function manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-35(8):677–691, August 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. E. Bryant. Symbolic boolean manipulation with ordered binary-decision diagrams. ACM Computing Surveys, 24(3):293–318, September 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Cortesi, B. Le Charlier, and P. Van Hentenryck. Conceptual and software support for abstract domain design: Generic structural domain and open product. Technical Report CS-93-13, Brown University, Providence, RI, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Cortesi, B. Le Charlier, and P. Van Hentenryck. Combinations of abstract domains for logic programming. In Conference Record of POPL’ 94: 21st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 227–239, Portland, Oregon, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. W. Dart. Dependency Analysis and Query Interfaces for Deductive Databases. PhD thesis, The University of Melbourne, Department of Computer Science, 1988. Printed as Technical Report 88/35.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Falaschi, M. Gabbrielli, K. Marriott, and C. Palamidessi. Conuence and concurrent constraint programming. In V. S. Alagar and M. Nivat, editors, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Algebraic Methodology and Software Technology (AMAST’95), volume 936 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 531–545. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. D. Jones and H. Søndergaard. A semantics-based framework for the abstract interpretation of Prolog. In S. Abramsky and C. Hankin, editors, Abstract Interpretation of Declarative Languages, chapter 6, pages 123–142. Ellis Horwood Ltd, West Sussex, England, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Marriott and H. Søndergaard. Notes for a tutorial on abstract interpretation of logic programs. North American Conference on Logic Programming, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. S. Mellish. Some global optimizations for a Prolog compiler. Journal of Logic Programming, 2(1):43–66, 1985.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. P. Schachte. Efficient ROBDD operations for program analysis. In K. Ramamohanarao, editor, ACSC’96: Proceedings of the 19th Australasian Computer Science Conference, pages 347–356. Australian Computer Science Communications, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Søndergaard. Immediate fixpoints and their use in groundness analysis. In V. Chandru and V. Vinay, editors, Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, volume 1180 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 359–370. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Zobel. Analysis of Logic Programs. PhD thesis, The University of Melbourne, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bagnara, R., Schachte, P. (1998). Factorizing Equivalent Variable Pairs in ROBDD-Based Implementations of Pos . In: Haeberer, A.M. (eds) Algebraic Methodology and Software Technology. AMAST 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1548. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49253-4_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49253-4_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65462-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49253-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics