Skip to main content

Modeling Urgency in Timed Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1536))

Abstract

Timed systems can be modeled as automata (or, generally, discrete transition structures) extended with real-valued variables (clocks) measuring the time elapsed since their initialization. The following features are also common in the above models.

  • States are associated with time progress conditions specifying how time can advance. Time can progress at a state by t only if all the intermediate states reached satisfy the associated time progress condition.

  • At transitions, clock values can be tested and modified. This is usually done by associating with transitions guards (conditions on clocks) and assignments. If a guard is true from an automaton state and a given clock valuation, the corresponding transition can be executed by modifying clocks as specified by the corresponding assignment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. N.C. Audsley, A. Bums, M.F. Richardson, and A.J. Wellings. Deadlinemonotonic scheduling. In Proc. 8th IEEE Workshop on Real-time Operating Systems and Software, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Alur, C. Courcoubetis, and D.L. Dill. Model checking in dense real time. Information and Computation, 104(1):2–34, 1993.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. J.F. Allen. Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the ACM, 26(11):832–843, November 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Bornot and J. Sifakis. On the composition of hybrid systems (complete version). In International NATO Summer School on “Verification of Digital and Hybrid Systems”, Antalya, Turkey, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Bornot and J. Sifakis. Relating time progress and deadlines in hybrid systems. In International Workshop, HART’97, pages 286–300, Grenoble, France, March 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1201, Spinger-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T.A. Henzinger, X. Nicollin, J. Sifakis, and S. Yovine. Symbolic model checking for real-time systems. Information and Computation, 111(2):193–244, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Jourdan, N. Layaïda, L. Sabry-Ismail, and C. Roisin. Authoring and presentation environment for interactive multimedia documents. In Proc. of the 4th Conf. on Multimedia Modelling, Singapore, November 1997. World Scientific Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Merlin. A study of the recoverability of computer systems. Master’s thesis, University of California, Irvine, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Sénac, M. Diaz, and P. de Saqui-Sannes. Toward a formal specification of multimedia scenarios. Annals of telecomunications, 49(5-6):297–314, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Sifakis. Use of petri nets for performance evaluation. In H. Beilner and E. Gelenebe, editors, Measuring, modelling and evaluating computer systems, pages 75–93. North-Holland, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Sifakis and S. Yovine. Compositional specification of timed systems. In 13th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS’96, pages 347–359, Grenoble, France, February 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1046, Spinger-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bornot, S., Sifakis, J., Tripakis, S. (1998). Modeling Urgency in Timed Systems. In: de Roever, WP., Langmaack, H., Pnueli, A. (eds) Compositionality: The Significant Difference. COMPOS 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1536. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49213-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49213-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65493-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49213-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics