Abstract
A number of people have started talking today by saying I wanted to figure out what such and such term means. What does integrity mean? What does confidentiality mean? I definitely don’t want to give you the impression I’m going to tell you what trust means. Trust management is supposed to be an incredibly vague and provocative term invented by Matt Blaze. I don’t know whether he intended it that way, but it comes naturally to him. What I find is that trust management the term induces this projection. People hear it and they think “Oh, that sounds good, that’s what I need”. So that’s good. So what I am going to do is give you a motivating example, tell you a little bit about what we’re trying to accomplish by building a trust management system and what are the essential design decisions we need when we build the PolicyMaker trust management system and then some open questions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Feigenbaum, J. (1998). Overview of the AT&T Labs Trust-Management Project. In: Christianson, B., Crispo, B., Harbison, W.S., Roe, M. (eds) Security Protocols. Security Protocols 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1550. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49135-X_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49135-X_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65663-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49135-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive