Skip to main content

On m-Permutation Protection Scheme against Modification Attack

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Information Security and Privacy (ACISP 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1587))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The EEPROM modification attack was first described by Anderson and Kuhn in [3]. This simple and low-cost attack is very efficient against tamperproof devices carrying a secret key stored in EEPROM. Soon after the attack has been published, we proposed a protection scheme using cascaded m-permutations of hidden wires [8]. This cascaded m-permutation protection scheme uses an (m×n)-bit encoding for an n-bit key and for which the best known attack will take at most O(n m) probes to compromise the permutations of the hidden wires. However, it is observed that if a particular card (instead of the whole batch of cards) is to be compromised, the complexity can be greatly reduced, and in the best cases, it can even be reduced to linear time complexity. In this paper, we demonstrate how it can be done, and propose a revised m-permutation scheme that would close the loop-hole. It is also proved that the probability of breaking the revised scheme will be 1/2n−1 for a n-bit key.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D.G. Abraham, G.M. Dolan, G.P. Double, and J.V. Stevens, “Transaction Security System”, in IBM Systems Journal, volume 30, number 2, (1991), p.206–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Anderson and M. Kuhn, “Tamper Resistance — a Cautionary Note” in Proceedings of the Second USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce (1996), p.1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Anderson and M. Kuhn, “Low Cost Attacks on Tamper Resistant Devices”, in Security Protocols: 5th International Workshop, (1997), p.125–136.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Bao, R.H. Deng, Y. Han, A. Jeng, A.D. Narasimhalu, and T. Ngair, “Breaking Public Key Cryptosystems on Tamper Resistant Devices in the Presence of Transient Faults”, in Security Protocols: International Workshop’ 97

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Boneh, R.A. DeMillo, and R.J. Lipton, “On the Importance of Checking Cryptographic Protocols for Faults”, in Advances in Cryptology-EUROCRYPT’ 97, p.37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Biham and A. Shamir, “Differential Fault Analysis of Secret Key Cryptosystems”, in Advances in Cryptology-CRYPTO’ 97, p.513–25

    Google Scholar 

  7. T.H. Cormen, C.E. Leiserson and R.L. Rivest, “Introduction to Algorithms”, MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W.W. Fung and J.W. Gray, “Protection Against EEPROM Modification Attacks”, in Information Security and Privacy: Third Australasian Conference, ACISP’98, 1998, p.250–260.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson, “Computers and Intractability”, W.H. Freeman & Co., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C.E. Shannon, “Communication Theory of Secrecy System”, in Computer Security Journal Vol.6, No.2, 1990, p.7–66.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fung, W.W., Gray, J.W. (1999). On m-Permutation Protection Scheme against Modification Attack. In: Pieprzyk, J., Safavi-Naini, R., Seberry, J. (eds) Information Security and Privacy. ACISP 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1587. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48970-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48970-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65756-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48970-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics