The NAVL Distributed Virtual Reality System

  • Martine Wedlake
  • Kin F. Li
  • Fayez El Guibaly
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1554)


Current distributed virtual reality systems suffer from many inherent difficulties: inadequate network architecture, poor object distribution and coherency, poor system resource management, and poor overall performance. This paper outlines the NAVL DVR system, designed to overcome these problems with a distributed client/server network architecture and master/slave autonomous object distribution mechanism using ForceLet simulation.


Network Architecture Application Programming Interface Virtual Object Wide Area Network Dead Reckoning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    C. Carlsson and O. Hagsand. DIVE — a multi user virtual reality system. In IEEE VRAIS, pages 394–400. IEEE, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Circle of Fire Studios, Inc.
  3. [3]
    G. Couris and J. Dollimore. Distributed Systems: Concepts and Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1988.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    IEEE standard for distributed interactive simulation — application protocols. IEEE std 1278.1-1995, IEEE, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    James D. Foley, Andries van Dam, Steven K. Feiner, and John F. Hughes. Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 2nd edition, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Philip M. Hubbard. Collision Detection for Interactive Graphics Applications. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, Brown University, October 1993.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Rick Kazman. Making WAVES: On the design of architectures for low-end distributed environments. In IEEE VRAIS, pages 443–449. IEEE, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Rick Kazman. HIDRA: An architecture for highly dynamic physically based multi-agent simulations. IJCS, pages 149–164, May 1995.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Chris Shaw and Mark Green. The MR toolkit peers package and experiment. In IEEE VRAIS, pages 463–469. IEEE, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Abraham Silberschatz and James L. Peterson. Operating System Concepts. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1988.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    The virtual reality modeling language 2.0. ISO/IEC cd14772, VRML Architecture Group.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Martine Wedlake. NAVL phase 1 results: Simulation engine. Technical report, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Victoria, February 1998.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Martine Wedlake and Kin F. Li. Sailing the high seas with the NAVL virtual reality system. In IEEE WESCANEX, pages 208–213, Winnipeg, M.N., May 1997. IEEE.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Martine Wedlake and Kin F. Li. The simulaiton and execution architecture for the NAVL DVR system. In IEEE PACRIM, pages 93–96, Victoria, B.C., August 1997. IEEE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martine Wedlake
    • 1
  • Kin F. Li
    • 1
  • Fayez El Guibaly
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations